安樂(lè)死的幾個(gè)理論問(wèn)題試探.pdf

1、上海交通大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文安樂(lè)死的幾個(gè)理論問(wèn)題試探姓名：馮秀云申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：馬克思主義理論與思想政治教育指導(dǎo)教師：陳大鋼200309012SOMETHEETICALISSUESONEUTHANASIAABSTRACTThedisputeabouteuthanasiainthetheypracticehasbeenlongtime.Since1980s’themedicallegaldisputeshasbecomememebut

2、suchdisputesisdifficulttobesettledduetolackoftherelatedlaw.EuthanasiaisaninevitabletissueinthelegislativedevolvementinChina.Thusafterinsightfulstudyofeuthanasiawecanfindthesoundtheeticalbasisfthelegislationofeuthanasiato

3、promotethelegislation.Throughmethodofcomparelogicanalyseswestudytheeuthanasiafromsocialmedicalmallegalperspectivesabouttheconceptsubjectstatusright.Thisessayisdividedintofiveparts:1.Thedefinitionofeuthanasia.Thethesistri

4、estopresentsomenewpointsonthedefinitionofeuthanasiabyretrospectionanalysesofsomeargumentsonitsdefinitioninacademia.Itindicatesthattheeuthanasiaisanoptimizeddeathaboutthetissueofthequalityofdeathnotabouthowtokeepalive.2.T

5、heobjectofeuthanasia.Byanalyzingmedicinelawcriteriaftheobjectofeuthanasiathisthesisputsitsemphasisontheobjectsofeuthanasiaaswellasthemedicalsocialcriteriafitrightofeuthanasiawhat’smeitgivessomeregulationsassessmentonthec

6、riteriaofvoluntaryrequiringproceduresthatofassociateddyingsuffering.alsothethesisanalysesthedifferencesamongobjectofeuthanasiahumanvegetablethebrain–deathpatient.3.Thesignificanceofeuthanasia.Thethesisanalysestherational

7、itylegitimacyofeuthanasiafromfourperspectivesofitssocialsignificancesocialbasissocialevaluationlegitimacy.4.Therightobligationofeuthanasia.Thisthesiselabatesonthedifferencesamongrightobligationofeuthanasialiferightanalys