簡(jiǎn)介：東南大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文公共選擇理論的政治哲學(xué)研究姓名章勝申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)政治學(xué)理論指導(dǎo)教師袁久紅20060115DISQUISITIONONPUBLICCHOICETHEORYASPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYGRADUATEZHANGSHENGTUTORYUANJIUHONGSCHOOLSOUTHEASTUNIVERSITYABSTRACTTHEPUBLICCHOICETHEORYISALLINTERSECTINGSCIENCEBETWEENPOLITICALSCIENCEANDECONOMICSWHICHHASBECOMEOUEOFTHEMOSTIMPORTANTIDEOLOGIESINNEWPOLITICALECONOMYTHISSCIENCESTUDIESTHEFUNCTIONINGOFPOLITICALMARKETANDHUMANACTIVITIESONTHISMARKETBYWAYOFUSINGBASICPRINCIPLESANDHYPOTHESISOFNEWCLASSICECONOMICSTHISTHEORYHOLDSTHATTHEECONOMICEFFICIENCYCARLNOTBERAISEDANDTHEFAIRNESSONDISTRIBUTIONCANNOTBEENHANCED，EITHERIFGOVERNMENTINTERFERESTHEMARKETONTHECOUNTRYGOVERNMENTFAILUREISINEVITABLETHISARTICLESTUDIESTHEPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYOFPUBLICCHOICETHEORYSUMMARIZESANDANALYZESTHETHOUGHTANDVIEWPOINTOFPUBLICCHOICEONLIBERTYRIGHT，JUSTICE，DEMOCRACYANDCONSTITUTIONALISMTHEFOCALPOINTSOFTHISARTICLEARERELATIONSHIPSBETWEENLIBERTYANDGOVERNMENTANDTHEIDEAFORRESTRUCTURINGTHEPOLITICALINSTITUTION，WHICHWILLENSURETHELIBERTYANDPOLITICALEQUALITYINBUCHANAN’SEYESANDTHEREISATENTATIVECOMMENTONPUBLICCHOICEBYWAYOFMARXISMKEYWORDSPUBLICCHOICE；GOVERNMENTROLES；CONSTITUTIONALPOLITICALECONOMY；POLITICALPHILOSOPHY；DEMOCRACYII

簡(jiǎn)介：口GO船≮索取號(hào)二啦生韭且魚(yú)皇Q一密級(jí)_量LJL一南京師勉大掌碩士學(xué)位淪文圖語(yǔ)言哲學(xué)視角下的哈特法哲學(xué)思想研究作者院系指導(dǎo)教師學(xué)剁專業(yè)曲，娜’法學(xué)院法學(xué)理論ABSTRACTINTHEDEVELOPMENTPROCESSOFJURISPRUDENCE，BETWEENNATURALLAWANDPOSITIVELAWTHEREAREHUGEQUALITATIVEDIFFERENCESABOUTTHEDOCTRINEOFLAWBUTTHEYSHAREWITHAEPISTEMOLOGYOFTHESUBJECTOBJECTTHEREISABIGERRORINTHETRADITIONALEPISTEMOLOGYSOHARTJUMPSOUTOFTHETRADITIONALEPISTEMOLOGYANDARRANGESTHETEXTOFLAWWHICHDEPENDSONTHENEWANALYTICMODELSOFWITTGENSTEIN’SPHILOSOPHYOFLANGUAGEAGAIN，ANDBUILDSUPTHETHEORYOFDESCFIPTIVEJURISPMDENCEASTHEANALYTICMODELOFTHELINGUISTICSINPHILOSOPHYHARTREJECTTHEMODELTHATTRACTIONALPHILOSOPHERSHADTRIEDTOFINDOUT‘‘WHATISLAW”FORALONGAGOHETHINKSTHATBASICLEGALCONCEPTSMIGHTNOTBEDEFINITEDBUTCANBEDESCRIPTEDTHISISACENTRALARGUMENTOFHIMSELFBYWITTGEUSTEIN’SPHILOSOPHYOFLANGUAGEANDJ’L’AUSTIN’SSEMANTICANALYSIS，HARTPUTSFORWARDTHEFAMOUSTHEORYOFLEGALRULE，ANDINITIATESANEWEMOFRULEHARTFINDSOUTTHETHEORYOFINTERNALVIEWTHATHARTGREATCONTRIBUTESTOLEGALRESEARCHOFWESTERN，WHICHBRINGSLEGALRESEARCHOFWESTEMINTOANEWERAASTOATRADITIONALPROPOSITIONOFTHERELATIONOFLAWANDMORALITYHARTSTILLSTANDSINTHEPOSITIVEPOSITIONANDINSISTSONTHESEPARATEPROPOSITIONBETWEENLAWANDMORALITYHESENDSACHALLENGETOTHENATURALLAWBYAMODERATEAPPROACHHARTCLEARLYFINDSOUTTHENEUTRALITYOFLEGALMORALITYWHICHDOESN’TREPELMORALITYEVALUATIONTOLAWASANEWEPISTEMOLOGYOFLINGUISTICSINPHILOSOPHY，HARTESTABLISHESANEWLEGALTHEORYANDMAKEUP‘‘LINGUISTICTURNOFJURISPMDENCE”INTWENTIETHCENTURYMODEMMETHODSOFURISPMDENCEINWESTAREFOCUSEDONTHEFURTHERDEVELOPMENTOFHART’STHEREAREGREATINSPIRATIONSFORMHART’SRESEARCHTOCHINESEJURISPRUDENCECHINESEJURISPMDENCERESEARCHNOTONLYBREAKSTHROUGHTHEORIGINALMODEOFTHEORYINTHEONTOLOGYBUTALSOBREAKSDOWNTHEINHERENTMODEOFEPISTEMOLOGYTOACHIEVETHEIDENTITYOFTHEDOUBLEUPGRADEKEYWORDSLINGUISTICSINPHILOSOPHY；HART；JURISPMDENCE；RULEII

簡(jiǎn)介：ECONOMICPHILOSOPHYISTOMANKINDINTROSPECTOFTHEECONOMYIIFE，ECONOMICBEHAVIORANDECONOMYTHEORIESITRUSHEDOUTTHETRADITIONALECONOMICS”SEEATHINGDISAPPEARAPERSON4OFNARROWSEEANAREAFROMTHEANGLEOFVIEWEXCAVATIONOFTHEPHILOSOPHY”P(pán)ERSON”SPROBLEMOFTHEECONOMICBACK，ESTABLISHEDTHEALLNEWVISUALFIELDOF”NOTONLYCONCERNATHING，BUTALSOWANTTOCONCERNAPERSON”THUSCURRENTLY，THEOURCOUNTRYISMORESERIOUSOFTHREEISSUESOFFARMERS，BELONGTOANECONOMICPROBLEM，BUTAGAINNOTPUREISANECONOMICPROBLEMTHEOURCOUNTRYFARMERSOCIALSTATUSOFLOWLY，THEIMPERFECTIONOFTHEBASICRIGHTS，SOURCEINOURCOUNTRYTHESOCIALCASTESYSTEMOFSEVERALTHOUSANDYEARSCONTLNUE，CONCRETEPERFORMANCEATOURCOUNTRYPRACTICETORLONGTIMEOFDIFFERENTPOLICYTOCITYANDRURALTHEBACKOFTHEECONOMICSYSTEMISTHEWORTHMINDSETOFTHEWHOLESOCIETYTHEOURCOUNTRYFARMERPROBLEMISTHERESULTOFTHEDEVELOPMENTOFWITHDEMANDANDFARMERTHATOURWORTHMINDSETHADBEENDEVIATEFARMERINCREASINGLYANDSERIOUSLYTHEPROBLEMTHATTHEFARMERPROBLEMCOMESOUTTHECLEARLYSHOWANDTHEREVELATION，ALREADYNOTPUREISTHEPROBLEMOFTHEECONOMICDEVELOPMENT，BUTTHEPROBLEMOFTHEDEEPERPERSONTHEREFORE，RESOLVETHEFARMERPROBLEMHASTOBEHAVEAFOOTHOLDINTHEVISUALFIELDOFTHEECONOMYPHILOSOPHY，NOTONLYONLYSEETHEFARMERPROBLEMMAKEANECONOMICPROBLEMMOREWANTTHEPROBLEMOFTHEPERSONWHOSEETHEECONOMICBACKTHEFARMERPROBLEMRESOLVE，HAVETOESTABLISHARIGHTVALUEFIRST，INORDERTOPROVIDEAKINDOFCOMMONANDWORTHMINDSETFORTHEWHOLESOCIETYTHEREFOREHAVETOSETUDWITHTHEWORTHMINDSETOF”FARMERISORIGINALLY’，ESTABLISHMENTFAIRSOCIALSYSTEM。PROMOTETHEFARMERDEVELOPTHUSKEYVORDTHEECONOMICPHILOSOPHYFARMERPROBLEMMAKEPEOPLETHECENTER

簡(jiǎn)介：上海大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文全球化背景下法律沖突的法哲學(xué)思考從法律一體化和多元化角度姓名常虹申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)憲法學(xué)與行政法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師倪正茂20050501上海大掌頸士學(xué)位論文ABSTRACTINTHESEYEARS，GLOBALIZATIONISHIGHFREQUENCYUSINGCONCEPTINDOMESTICACADEMETHELAWDOMAINRESEARCHERISALSODISCUSSINGABOUTTHETOPICOFGLOBALIZATIONTHEREWASAPOINTINLAWFIELDTHATTHELEGALGLOBALIZATIONISTHELAWSYSTEMTHATLAWINALLKINDSOFCOUNTRYANDNATIONALITYAMALGAMATIONTHAT’SRESULTISAPPEARINGANEWUNIFICATIONLAWSYSTEMNAMED“WODDLAW”WECONSIDERTHATTHISCOGNITIONSEIZETHEMAINATTRIBUTEOFLEGALGLOBALIZATIONALTHOUGHBUTITISHALFBAKEDCONCEPTINFACTS1AWHASCOMPLEXSTRUCTURE，ARRANGEMENTANDFORMSOTHELAWUNIFICATIONISCOMPARATIVECONCEPTWHETHER“DOMESTICLAWINTEMATIONAZATLON”O(jiān)R“INTERNATIONALLAWDOMESTIC”THEPAROCHIALANDCOMMONKNOWLEDGEDIVERSITYISINCLUDEDBUTWEMUSTBENOTEDTHATWEWILLHAVENOTALLAROUNDUNDERSTANDINGONGLOBALIZATIONIFWEONLYKEEPEYESONTRADITIONALINTERNATIONALLAWANDTOUNDERSTANDLAWCONFLICT，ESPECIALLYINTERNATIONALPRIVATELAWORINTERNATIONALECONOMYLAWONEHAND，THEYWILLFOCUSONCIVILANDCOMMERCIALLAWANDIGNORETHEIMPACTONPUBLICLAWAREAOFGTOBALIZATIONONTHEOTHERHAND，THEYWILLSTAYATTHELISTOFPHENOMENONINLAWCONFLICTCASEANDLACKUNDERSTANDINGONTENSERELATIONOFPAROCHIALANDCOMMONKNOWLEDGESO，THEWRITERSTRYTOSURVEYTHELAWDIVERSITYANDINTEGRATIONONTHELEGALGLOBALIZATIONBACKGROUNDINLEGALPHILOSOPHYVIEWTHEWRITER7SPOINTISLAWGLOBALIZATIONPROCESSISINCLUDEDTHATLEGALINTEGRITYANDDIVERSITYTHEYAREUN№RMUSINGPHILOSOPHYVIEWTHATTHEUN“ORMOFCOMMONNESSANDINDIVIDUALITYTHECOMMONNESSISCONSISTEDININDIVIDUALITYFROMCURRENTSITUATIONTOVIEWLAWGTOBALIZATIONISBEINGPRIMARYPHASETHISPHASEHASHEGEMONICCHARACTERBECAUSEOFWESTERNCAPITALISMCOUNT吖DILATATIONWEMUSTWORKOUTREPLYFORHOLDINGCOUNTRYCONTINUITYINLAWTRADITIONFIRSTLYLEGALTRANSPLANTISAKEYMEANSFOWALKOUTTHECOMERTHISTRANSPLANTISNOTONLYACULTUREPRODUCTOUTPUTBUTALSOAPOSITIVEATTITUDETOPARTICIPATEINGLOBALIZATIONITSADEEPSEATEDCOMMUNICATIONANDDIALOGOFLAWCULTURESECONDLYCONSUMMATEANDMODIFICATIONINLAWSYSTEMITSELFISALSOAKEYWAYINTHEGLOBALIZATIONBACKGROUND。CHINALAWDESIGNISWORKINGONTHEBEFOREMODERNTIMEANDAFTERMODERNTIMEWEAREFACINGCONFLICTINTHEEASTERNANDWESTERNCULTUREINTHESITUATION，WESHOULDHOLDOURNATIONALITYCHARACTERISTICMOREIMPORTANT，WESHOULDBEUSINGRESOURCEOFVI

簡(jiǎn)介：華中師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文“全面建設(shè)小康社會(huì)”的哲學(xué)思考姓名袁光校申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)馬克思主義理論與思想政治教育指導(dǎo)教師劉宗武20050501◎碩士學(xué)位論文MASTER’STHESIS建設(shè)小康社會(huì)的實(shí)踐充分說(shuō)明，只有樹(shù)立科學(xué)發(fā)展觀，把發(fā)展作為黨執(zhí)政興國(guó)的第一要?jiǎng)?wù)，社會(huì)主義現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)事業(yè)才能不斷走向成功；全面建設(shè)小康社會(huì)的成功將昭示我們，堅(jiān)持辯證方法分析事物，正確認(rèn)識(shí)和對(duì)待前進(jìn)道路上遇到的困難和問(wèn)題，我們的事業(yè)將無(wú)往不勝；全面建設(shè)小康社會(huì)的成功也將昭告世人，必須用歷史唯物主義的寬廣眼界看問(wèn)題，充分認(rèn)識(shí)中國(guó)實(shí)現(xiàn)小康社會(huì)的全球意義。關(guān)鍵詞全面建設(shè)小康社會(huì)哲學(xué)思考Ⅱ

簡(jiǎn)介：論文指導(dǎo)小組成員劉放桐教授黃頌杰教授俞吾金教授張慶熊教授張汝倫教授莫偉民教授汪堂家教授悶IL中文摘要?？麓_信政治與哲學(xué)的關(guān)系乃永恒而根本的關(guān)系。一旦人們置身于古希臘哲學(xué)的自身關(guān)切史，哲學(xué)與政治的這種關(guān)系即變得顯而易見(jiàn)?！皺?quán)力”，據(jù)此乃?？轮攸c(diǎn)拷問(wèn)對(duì)象，但并非其根本關(guān)切；“權(quán)力分析“，乃?？抡握軐W(xué)重要組成部分及拷問(wèn)路徑，但并非其終極歸宿。?？碌恼握軐W(xué)乃“特別想拷問(wèn)政治”的哲學(xué)。?？逻@種對(duì)政治的拷問(wèn)，一如歷史和政治領(lǐng)域的質(zhì)詢一樣，旨在使先前諸多未曾意識(shí)到的問(wèn)題，得以袒露出來(lái)。?？抡J(rèn)為他所努力拷問(wèn)的這些問(wèn)題并非由某一預(yù)設(shè)性的政治景觀所決定，而且并非趨向于實(shí)現(xiàn)某一明確的政治方案。換言之，?？抡握軐W(xué)所關(guān)切的，是且始終是“當(dāng)下“，是“生活“，是我們自身的當(dāng)下歷史生活。對(duì)?？露?，真正重要的政治哲學(xué)問(wèn)題，是且始終是人們能否逾越權(quán)力關(guān)系，能否在權(quán)力關(guān)系之外生活福柯?lián)硕扇宋乃既肷鐣?huì)，由“他者“思入“自身“，由政治思入倫理。?？隆疤貏e想拷問(wèn)政治”的政治哲學(xué)思想歸宿，據(jù)此由“在世之在“的“權(quán)力關(guān)系“此一無(wú)名“他者“和異己存在，通向“關(guān)切自身“的“自身本體論一及“生存的美學(xué)”；由“我們自身的當(dāng)下歷史存在論“通向“作為生活方式的友愛(ài)“的“友愛(ài)政治學(xué)一及“友愛(ài)共同體“由此，福柯政治哲學(xué)拷問(wèn)最終呈現(xiàn)出一種“倫理學(xué)的姿態(tài)一；?？抡握軐W(xué)思想形態(tài)最終演進(jìn)為一種“作為倫理學(xué)的政治學(xué)一。最終更令?？赂信d趣的，乃是我們自身的當(dāng)下生存或日道德倫理，而非提出一套總體性宏大政治方案。與提出一套總體化宏大政治方案相比，?？赂鼧?lè)于盡可能地敞開(kāi)從后面通抵政治學(xué)并切入社會(huì)的具體而普遍的問(wèn)題。對(duì)?？露?，關(guān)涉我們當(dāng)下生存的當(dāng)務(wù)之急的問(wèn)題，并非某一純粹政治學(xué)問(wèn)題，而是如何將倫理學(xué)一認(rèn)識(shí)論與政治學(xué)通貫一體，從而幫助人們?cè)诟髯灶I(lǐng)域?yàn)闋?zhēng)取合法權(quán)益而從事積極抗?fàn)?。因而，?？抡握軐W(xué)所注重的，乃是如何將理論與實(shí)踐、思想和行為在某一倫理學(xué)意義上鏈接起來(lái)，這種倫理學(xué)，就其實(shí)際效果而言卻又是政治性的此即福柯“作為倫理學(xué)的政治學(xué)一之政治哲學(xué)根本思想意旨“博學(xué)一的福柯，因此深諳“揚(yáng)棄一之道；揚(yáng)棄性，乃?？抡握軐W(xué)思想一大特性。福柯政治哲學(xué)思想拷問(wèn)，其或隱或顯的“對(duì)話人“，極為繁多；很難說(shuō)哪種既往政治思想乃?？隆白趲煛暗承┘韧枷爰遗c?？吕碚摐Y源頗深，對(duì)其產(chǎn)生巨大影響；特別是尼采、馬克思以及諸多古希臘思想家。?？?，并非一味反傳統(tǒng)的虛無(wú)主義者，亦非烏托邦主義者，更非“無(wú)政府主義者一倡導(dǎo)“作為生活方式的友愛(ài)一及“友愛(ài)共同體“的?？?，從來(lái)不認(rèn)為人們能在權(quán)力關(guān)系及政治共同體之外生活。氤氳于?？滦膽训膯?wèn)題是在一個(gè)無(wú)神且無(wú)人的空曠之地，何以安身，何以立命盡管?？略缭缛鍪謮m寰從而留下諸多未竟之思，但?？乱廊浑[隱給我們指明遠(yuǎn)方一片精神沃土，亦即借由人人通過(guò)自身關(guān)切自身，由此而建構(gòu)出某一“作為生活方式“的“友愛(ài)共同體一；而這一“友愛(ài)共同體“之構(gòu)想，決非“小國(guó)寡民，雞犬相聞，民至老死不柏往來(lái)“的無(wú)政府主義烏托邦。

簡(jiǎn)介：四川師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文知識(shí)的產(chǎn)權(quán)界定、激勵(lì)及其哲學(xué)思考姓名陳嘉翔申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)馬克思主義哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師李小平20050601方式給予其剩余索取權(quán)，才能克服這類知識(shí)由于信息不對(duì)稱而引起的激勵(lì)不相容。潛在性知識(shí)指人們學(xué)習(xí)新知識(shí)的能力，對(duì)于這種知識(shí)的激勵(lì)實(shí)際就是鼓勵(lì)人們不斷學(xué)習(xí)新知識(shí)、掌握新技能。從產(chǎn)權(quán)的角度來(lái)說(shuō)，潛在性知識(shí)的激勵(lì)，只有承認(rèn)學(xué)習(xí)者對(duì)新學(xué)到的知識(shí)享有所有權(quán)才能實(shí)現(xiàn)。從辯證唯物主義的視角來(lái)看，人類的知識(shí)體系也是一個(gè)矛盾的統(tǒng)一體，各種知識(shí)只有相互達(dá)到平衡才是穩(wěn)定的，如果知識(shí)體系不平衡，則知識(shí)會(huì)產(chǎn)生負(fù)面的影響，如環(huán)境、安全、倫理問(wèn)題等等。當(dāng)前人類所面臨的知識(shí)快速增長(zhǎng)所帶來(lái)的威脅，其根源在于知識(shí)發(fā)展的不平衡，對(duì)于各個(gè)門(mén)類知識(shí)的激勵(lì)，應(yīng)辯證地對(duì)待，有區(qū)別地進(jìn)行激勵(lì)。關(guān)鍵訶知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)信息不對(duì)稱矛盾統(tǒng)一

簡(jiǎn)介：東南大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文論生態(tài)主義的政治哲學(xué)姓名魯小犬申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)政治學(xué)理論指導(dǎo)教師袁久紅20070101論生態(tài)主義的政治哲學(xué)ONTHEPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYOFECOLOGISMGRADUATELNXIAOQUANTNTORPROFE日ORYNANJIUHONGSCHOOLSOUTHEASTUNIVERSITYABSTRACTECOLOGISMISAVERYIMPORTANTSOCIALCURRENTOFTHOUGHTINCONTEMPORARYWORLD，ITSTHEORIESARECOMPLICATEDANDTHESOCIALINF’LUENCEISVERYHUGEITHASANIMPORTANTTHEORYANDTHEPRACTICESIGNIFICANCETOCARRYOUTTHESPECIALIZEDRESEARCHORLITTHISARTICLEMAINLYANALYZEDTHEPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYOFECOLOGISMITSINFLUENCE，ITSVALUEANDITSLIMITATIONFROMTHEPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYSTRATIFICATIONPLANETHEARTICLEISDIVIDEDINTOFIVEPARTS，THEFIRSTPARTANDTHELASTONETRYTOCARRYONTHEDESCRIPTIONANDCRITIQUESTOTHECONTEMPORARYPRINCIPLEOFECOLOGISMCURRENTOFTHOUGHTINGENERAL，BUTTHREEPARTSOFTHEMIDDLERECONSIDERTHETHEORYOFECOLOGYCRISISTHINKABOUTHOWTOCONSTRUCTANDDESIGNTHEFUTUREOFSOCIETY。THISARTICLEFIRSTCOMBEDANDNARRATEDTHEORIGINS，THEDEVELOPMENTTHEMAINSCHOOLSANDTHEBASICCHARACTERISTICOFECOLOGISMTHENANALYZEDTHEROOTCAUSEOFECOLOGYCRISISFROMTHEVIEWOFTHEPRINCIPLEOFECOLOGISMTHECONCLUSIONWHICHTHEPRINCIPLEOFECOLOGISMOBTAINEDISTHATTHEREARECERTAINRELATIONSHIPSBETWEENTHEECOLOGYCRISISANDTHEHUMANCENTERPRINCIPLETHOUGHTPATTERNANDTHEPRESENTECONOMICSYSTEMANDTHEPOLITICALSYSTEMINORDERTOENABLETHEHUMANITYTOGOOUTTHEMIREOFECOLOGYCRISISANDSTEPTOTHEFUTUREGREENSOCIETYWHICHHUMANITYISINHARMONYWITHTHENATURE，THEECOLOGISTSCONSIDEREDTHATITMUSTCHANGETHETHOUGHTPATTERNSFROMTHENONHUMANITYCENTERPRINCIPLETOTHEHUMANITYCENTERPRINCIPLE；IMPLEMENT”THESTABLESTATEECONOMY’INTHEECONOMYIMPLEMENTSTHENEWEQUALINPOLITICS，THEBASICDEMOCRACYANDTHEJUSTICEOFECOLOGYTHEN，THISTEXTEXPLICATESTWOPATTERNSOFTHEFUTUREGREENSOCIETYECOMARXISMPATTERNANDECOANARCHISMPATTERNFINALLY，THISARTICLEANALYZEDTHEINFLUENCEOFTHEECOLOGYPRINCIPLEPOLITICSTOTHETRADITIONALPOLITICSFROMTHEPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYANGLEOFVIEWANDAPPRAISALEDITSESSENCE，LIMITATIONANDTHETRENDOFTHEECOLOGYPRINCIPLEPOLITICSPHILOSOPHYKEYWORDSECOLOGISM；ECOLOGYPOLITICS；JUSTICEOFECOLOGY；GREENSOCIETY；ECOSOCIALISMIV

簡(jiǎn)介：山東大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文主體與制度的互動(dòng)關(guān)于制度的一種哲學(xué)思考姓名孟凱申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)馬克思主義哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師劉陸鵬20050511山東大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文中文摘要隨著改革的不斷深化，制度成為知識(shí)界關(guān)注的一個(gè)中心問(wèn)題．社會(huì)科學(xué)各學(xué)科從不同的角度對(duì)制度功能、制度變遷、制度轉(zhuǎn)型、制度創(chuàng)新等問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了全面的探討和深入的研究，涉及到經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、法學(xué)、文化學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)、政治學(xué)、倫理學(xué)等各個(gè)領(lǐng)域。這要求我們?cè)诟爬偨Y(jié)制度研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上，從哲學(xué)的高度去反思和研究制度問(wèn)題，推進(jìn)制度研究的不斷深入．從哲學(xué)層面探究制度問(wèn)題，一種創(chuàng)新的思路就是從主體出發(fā)，深入探索制度與主體的互動(dòng)關(guān)系，突破對(duì)制度建構(gòu)的傳統(tǒng)理念和模式．為全面理解主體與制度的互動(dòng)，必須首先把制度置于唯物史觀的視野中，從分析制度的本質(zhì)特征入手，揭示出主體對(duì)制度的依存和超越．制度是歷史范疇，任何現(xiàn)實(shí)的制度都處在變化發(fā)展過(guò)程中；制度是關(guān)系范疇，它從關(guān)系中發(fā)展出來(lái)，是社會(huì)關(guān)系的具體體現(xiàn)；制度是規(guī)范范疇，構(gòu)成社會(huì)秩序的基礎(chǔ)．對(duì)主體在現(xiàn)代和后現(xiàn)代哲學(xué)中嬗變的分析，可以從理論層面彰顯制度對(duì)主體的塑造與限制．歷史和邏輯兩個(gè)維度的分析凸顯了制度產(chǎn)生和存在的主體依據(jù)，主體的歷史性與制度的歷史性具有內(nèi)在一致性．人的主體性是現(xiàn)代人最重要的觀念之一。經(jīng)過(guò)現(xiàn)代主體對(duì)自己的主體性內(nèi)在的辯證的否定，現(xiàn)代人所具有的主體性不但沒(méi)有衰落，而且會(huì)向著全面的，開(kāi)放的、成熟的主體性方向發(fā)展．制度與主體交互作用、相互影響、密不可分．在一定程度上，哲學(xué)所談?wù)摰闹黧w是制度塑造出的主體．既定的制度是現(xiàn)實(shí)的，它對(duì)主體的影響和作用也是一種現(xiàn)實(shí)力量．主體理論的轉(zhuǎn)變與制度的轉(zhuǎn)型具有內(nèi)在一致性，與傳統(tǒng)社會(huì)中的制度相比，現(xiàn)代制度要適應(yīng)現(xiàn)代主體性的要求，須具有自由的功能、倫理的功能，秩序的功能．制度作為規(guī)則，以其自身的功能調(diào)節(jié)沖突，強(qiáng)化合作，規(guī)范主體行為，整合社會(huì)力量．在這個(gè)過(guò)程中，一方面，應(yīng)當(dāng)肯定，制度對(duì)個(gè)體主體性的規(guī)制是必要的；另一方面，也要看到，制度還會(huì)抹殺人的主體性，造成制度的異化．對(duì)主體有巨大影響的制度。產(chǎn)生于主體活動(dòng)中，在制度面前，主體不是消極被動(dòng)的，主體可選擇制度、改造制度、設(shè)計(jì)制度．制度創(chuàng)新，制度建設(shè)必須立足于對(duì)主體與制度互動(dòng)關(guān)系的深刻把握，離開(kāi)了對(duì)主體的充分理解和關(guān)注，無(wú)論在理論層面還是在實(shí)踐層面，制度建設(shè)的探索都會(huì)迷失方向．把主體與制度的互動(dòng)的辯證關(guān)系落實(shí)到制度建設(shè)的層面，我們認(rèn)為，當(dāng)前制度建構(gòu)的方向，也即對(duì)既定制度的優(yōu)劣進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)的尺度，必須依據(jù)三個(gè)參數(shù)以人為本、秩序與主體自由的平衡、主體與對(duì)象的協(xié)調(diào)．制度建設(shè)的最終目標(biāo)是構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)，促進(jìn)主體自由全面的發(fā)展．關(guān)鍵詞制度主體制度建設(shè)

簡(jiǎn)介：南京航空航天大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文政治哲學(xué)視域中的政治自由姓名施曉花申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)馬克思主義理論與思想政治教育指導(dǎo)教師王巖20070301政治哲學(xué)視域中的政治自由2ABSTRACTPOLITICALLIBERTYISABASICPOLITICALCONCEPTWITHINPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYASANINDEPENDENTDISCIPLINESYSTEMOFPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYITSTHEETICALPREMISEISCOMPLETELYUNDERTHEGUIDANCEOFMARXISMTOCREATETHEPOLITICALHUMANITYBASEDONREFLECTIONOFTHEPOLITICALSOCIALNATUREOFHUMANEXISTENCETOSEARCHFTHEMAINPOLITICALSOCIETYDIMENSIONSTOESTABLISHTHEEXISTENCEDEVELOPMENTOFTHELOGICALPREMISEOFPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYAMONGTHEMTHEPOLITICALRATIONALITYGENERATESTHEPOLITICALMAINPARTYTHECAPABILITYTOPROSPERLEGITIMACYPROMOTESITSCRESPONDINGPOLITICALEQUALITYPOLITICALLIBERTYOTHERPOLITICALRIGHTSALSOPROMOTESPROTECTSTHEPOLITICALRIGHTSWHICHSHOULDHAVEAPOLITICALSYSTEMTHATISTHEDEMOCRATICNATUREOFPOLITICALDEMOCRACYTHUSPOLITICALLIBERTYFROMPOLITICALVALUELEVELDEPICTEDAMAGNIFICENTBLUEPRINTFTHECREATIONOFPOLITICALLIBERTIESBYALLMEANSSETUPREALISTICOBJECTIVESULTIMATEGOALOFPOLITICALLIBERTYFTHEHEALTHYDERLYDEVELOPMENTOFCONTEMPARYCHINESEPOLITICALBYPROVIDINGVALUEDIRECTIONSALSOESTABLISHATHEETICALBASISPOLITICALLIBERTYHASACERTAINSOCIALFUNCTIONSASTHEBASICPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYACADEMICAREASTHEAPPLICATIONACTERISTICSOFPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYISBASEDONTHEREALPOLITICALSOCIALVALUESTHATSHOULDBEASKEDTOJUDGETHELIKELIHOODBASISISBASEDONTHEPOLITICALREALITIESACADEMICLEGITIMACYOFTHEBASISOFANALYTICALRATIONALJUDGMENTBASEDONTHESOCIALISTMARKETECONOMYCONDITIONSEXPLESTHEEQUALITYEQUITYJUSTHUMANITIESCONTENTOFFREEMARKETECONOMYABONSTHETRADITIONALPLANNEDECONOMYTOTHEMARKETITSCRITICISMOFTHECONCEPTOFFREECOMPETITIONCOMBINESMARKETECONOMYWITHTHERICHCONTENTOFTHEINHERENTSUPREMACYOFPERSONALITYINTERESTSBASEDTHENATUREACTERISTICSOFTHEPRINCIPLEOFGIVINGPRIITYTOEFFICIENCYEFFECTIVENESSOFCOMBINATIONNOTEDTHATTHEFITFTHEULTIMATEEMBODIMENTOFTHEETERNALPURSUITOFSOCIALJUSTICEHUMANSAGELESSPURSUERCANBEACHIEVEDTHISSHOWSTHATMODERNMANISINTHEFINALMARKETINTHECODINATIONOFLIBERATIONFREEDOMTOENTERTHEKINGDOMOFLIBERTYACCDINGLYTHERELATIONSHIPAMONGTHEMARKETTHEGOVERNMENTTHELIBERTYTHEIMPROVEMENTOFCHINASSOCIALISTECONOMICSYSTEMPOLITICALSYSTEMTHEPOLITICALSYSTEMTHATHASIMPTANTPRACTICALSIGNIFICANCETHEGOALOFPOLITICALLIBERTYISTOACHIEVEREALSOCIALISTPOLITICALCIVILIZATION

簡(jiǎn)介：學(xué)校代碼10530學(xué)號(hào)200599010005分類號(hào)B224密級(jí)博士學(xué)位論文公選公正論中國(guó)公開(kāi)選拔制度的政治哲學(xué)研究中國(guó)公開(kāi)選拔制度的政治哲學(xué)研究學(xué)位申請(qǐng)人張子云指導(dǎo)教師劉啟良教授學(xué)院名稱哲學(xué)與歷史文化學(xué)院學(xué)科專業(yè)中國(guó)哲學(xué)研究方向中西哲學(xué)與文化比較二○○九年五月III湘潭大學(xué)湘潭大學(xué)學(xué)位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明學(xué)位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明本人鄭重聲明所呈交的論文是本人在導(dǎo)師的指導(dǎo)下獨(dú)立進(jìn)行研究所取得的研究成果。除了文中特別加以標(biāo)注引用的內(nèi)容外，本論文不包含任何其他個(gè)人或集體已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫(xiě)的成果作品。對(duì)本文的研究做出重要貢獻(xiàn)的個(gè)人和集體，均已在文中以明確方式標(biāo)明。本人完全意識(shí)到本聲明的法律后果由本人承擔(dān)。作者簽名日期年月日學(xué)位論文版權(quán)使用授權(quán)書(shū)學(xué)位論文版權(quán)使用授權(quán)書(shū)本學(xué)位論文作者完全了解學(xué)校有關(guān)保留、使用學(xué)位論文的規(guī)定，同意學(xué)校保留并向國(guó)家有關(guān)部門(mén)或機(jī)構(gòu)送交論文的復(fù)印件和電子版，允許論文被查閱和借閱。本人授權(quán)湘潭大學(xué)可以將本學(xué)位論文的全部或部分內(nèi)容編入有關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)進(jìn)行檢索，可以采用影印、縮印或掃描等復(fù)制手段保存和匯編本學(xué)位論文。涉密論文按學(xué)校規(guī)定處理。作者簽名日期年月日導(dǎo)師簽名日期年月日

簡(jiǎn)介：哲學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文法哲學(xué)視野下的權(quán)利客體新探魯慧麗哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)2006年6月CLASSIFIEDINDEXB089UDC68114DISSERTATIONFTHEMASTERDEGREEINPHILOSOPHYTHENEWIDEAFOBJECTOFRIGHTINLAWPHILOSOPHYCIDATELUHUILISUPERVISPROFXIEBAOJUNACADEMICDEGREEAPPLIEDFMASTEROFPHILOSOPHYSPECIALTYMARXISMPHILOSOPHYDATEOFALEXAMINATIONJUNE2006UNIVERSITYHARBININSTITUTEOFTECHNOLOGY

簡(jiǎn)介：分類號(hào)D693．9300X853143密級(jí)坌五學(xué)位論文大眾傳媒的心理效應(yīng)及其哲學(xué)反思作者姓名馬世軍指導(dǎo)導(dǎo)師姓名陳紅兵副教授東J匕大學(xué)文法學(xué)院申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士學(xué)科類別哲學(xué)學(xué)科專業(yè)名稱科學(xué)技術(shù)與哲學(xué)論文提交日期2006年1月5日論文答辯日期2006年3月8日學(xué)位授予廠1期答辯委員會(huì)主席李兆友評(píng)閱人李兆友、于淼、包國(guó)光東北大學(xué)2006年1月東北大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文ABSTRACTPSYCHOLOGICALEFFECTANDPHILOSOPHICALREFLECTIONONMASSMEDIAABSTRACTMEDIAISTHEPRINCIPALCOMPONENTTHATFACILITATESTHETRANSMISSIONANDGROWTHOFINFORMATIONINTHEWORLDMEDIAMANIPULATESANDMEDIATESASOCIETY．ANDTHEINFORMATIONITCARRIESIMPACTSASPECTSREGARDINGCOMMUNICATION，BEHAVIORS，ANDTHINKING．BASEDOILTHEABOVE，THESTUDYEXPLORESTHEIMPACTOFMASSMEDIAINTHECONTEXTOFTECHNOLOGICALPHILOSOPHYANDTECHNOLOGICALSOCIOLOGY．THISPAPERFIRSTCLARIFIEDTHEBASICCONCEPTSANDTHEORIESANDEXPLAINEDTHEHISTORYOFMEDIAONTHETECHNOLOGICALBASISFORTHEPSYCHOLOGICALEFFECTOFMEDIA．INTHISPAPER,THEDEVELOPMENTOFMEDIAISDIVIDEDINTOTHREEPERIODSINTERMSOFMEDIATECHNOLOGYTHEPREPERIODWHENVERBALANDWRITTENCOMMUNICATIONWASDOMINANT；THEPRINTINGPERIODWHICHWASINITIATEDBYINVENTIONOFPRINTINGTECHNOLOGY,ANDTHEELECTRONICPERIODWHICHISLEDBYWIRELESSTELECOMMUNICATIONMADINTEMET．THEPAPERISFOCUSESONTHEPSYCHOLOGICALIMPACTOFMASSMEDIAONINDIVIDUALSANDTHECOMIFTONRESPECTIVELY．1．FORTHECOLNLYLON，THEIMPACTISELUCIDATEDINASPECTSINVOLVINGTHEREVOLUTIONINAWARENESSTHINKING，ANDTHESTIMULATIONANDSATISFACTIONOFEMOTIONSTHATAREBROUGHTUPBYTHEMASSMEDIA．ATTHESAMETIME，THEPAPERALSOEXPLOREDTHEDISTINCTIVEIMPACTONTHEAWARANESS，THINKINGANDEMOTIONINPOINTOFDISTINCTIVECHARACTERISTICOFMASSMEDIANEWSPAPERPROMOTETHEDEVELOPMENTOFLOGICALARIDINDEPTHTHINKINGTHROUGHTHECHARACTERS；RADIOBRINGSOUTIMAGINATIONBYMEANSOFSOUND；TELEVISIONCOMBINESVISIONANDSOUNDANDFACILITATESTHEDEVELOPMENTOFVISUALTHINK；INTEMETISACOMBINATIONOFSOUND．VISION，ANDWORDS。ANDTHEREFORE，ISABLETOABSORBVIEWERSTOTALLY,FINALLY，THEPAPERREFLECTSONTHEIMPACTFROMTHEMEDIAANDDISCUSSESTHEFOLLOWINGFLLREEISSUES1、DOESTHEMEDIALOWERORINCREASEABILITYOFCOGNITIONTOHUMANBEING2GIVENTHEFACTTHATINDIVIDUALSARELIVINGINASOCIETYWITHMEDIA，HOWSHOULDWEDEALWITHTHERELATIONSHIPBETWEENMEDIAANDHUMANBEING3HASTHEMEDIALIBERATEDORSLAVED．III

簡(jiǎn)介：蘇州大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文傳統(tǒng)和諧觀與社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)構(gòu)建的哲學(xué)思考姓名尹德樹(shù)申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別碩士專業(yè)馬克思主義哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師吳忠偉20071101傳統(tǒng)和諧觀與社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)構(gòu)建的哲學(xué)思考英文摘要PHILOSOPHICALTHINL‘INGONR艮ADITIONALHARMONIOUSCONCEPTANDSOCIALISMHARMONIOUSSOCIETYCONSTRUCTIONABSTRACTONS印TEMBER1尹，2004，CPCO蚯CIADLYPUTFORWARDA11IST0IICALTA瑪ETOFTHEBUILDING0FA曲CIALISTHA肌OILIOUSSOCIE匆IILTLLEFOURTHPLENA巧ESSIONOFTHEL6伍CEN訂A1C0皿11INEEOFMECPCITISCLE捌YPOINTEDOMIIL位REP砸OFMENEWLYC刪EDL尹PEOPLE’SR印RESENTATIVECON鏟ESSTLL乏也‘‘H姍OILIOUSSOCIE鑼NEEDTOBUILTBYALL∞CIALPEOPLEWREWOULD削LYD印END0NPEOPLE，踟M晰NGCVE巧POSITIVE‰TORIN協(xié)PLA品螄NGOURBESTT0MAKEALIVELYSIMATIONWI也SOCIALHANNONY，TLLATEVE礙ONECONTAILLS陀SPONSIBILITRALLDSHARESAHA功ILOILIOUSCI妒’ASFORWEWOULD如LLYD印∞D(zhuǎn)0NPEOPLE，鋤DBRINGEVE巧POSITIVEFACTOR缸OPLAY，臼了INGOURBESTT0MALEALIVELYSITUATION誦也SOCIALHANILONY也ATEVE巧0NECONTAINSRESPONSIBIL毋ANDSHARESAH黜OILIO惦CI饑TLLATISGREATDECISIONOFOURP呻RMATBROUGHTHUMALLCULTL鵬，ESPECIALLYTLLECONCE州ONOFH鋤ONIOUSSOCI奶7PROPOSEDAILD晰SHEDBYC11INESE的DITIOILALCULTILRE，I11T0THECONSTR暉CTIONOFSOCIALISMMODE功JZATION，AILDGAVEITNEWMEANINGSTHEPROCESSOFBUILDINGASOCIALISTHAML砌OUSSOCIETYISAPROCESSOF仃AILSITION臺(tái)DMTRALDITIONALSOCIE夠T0MODEMSOCIE班趾DADE印REFOMOFMULTI1EVELANDMULTIDIRECTIONOFWHOLESOCIE夠NISNOTOILLYTEF0肋ECON0觚C，POLITICALANDCULTURALSYSTEMS，BUTALSOT0CHANGE也EMODEOFTLLIN玉【INGANDVALUEOFCONCEPT1RADITIONALCULTLLRE咖PROVIDEGOODIDEAFORSOLVINGALLKINDSOFCONTMDICTIONSANDPROBLEMS，WHERETLLET量LILLLIR培OFSOCIALHANILONYIS也EIMPORTALLTTLLINL【INGRESOURCEOFOURCONSTRILCTIONOFSOCIALISTHAMONIOUSSOCIETYTHOU曲NADITIONALLCONCEPTOFHANNONYCALLNOT百VEUS、ⅣELL_PR印AREDAILSWERSTOBUILDSOCIALISTHANILONIOUSSOCIE饑“CAIL百VEUSAHISTORICAJWISDOM觚DREFERENTIAJV甜UE南RPRAMICAJUSE’NLEONEOFIMPONANTREASONSMATCON允CI鋤CULTURE，懿FORM萄ORCHINESE仃ADITIONALCULTUREC鋤BEPASSEDIL

簡(jiǎn)介：索搬號(hào)J堅(jiān)∞盤(pán)』衛(wèi)一密級(jí)壘Ⅱ南京坪純?nèi)撇┦繉W(xué)位論文固迷失與追尋選擇與道德教育的哲學(xué)之思作者院系指導(dǎo)教師學(xué)科專業(yè)張夫偉教育學(xué)原日，ABSTRACTCHOICEISALLESSENTIALCHARACTERISTICOFHUMANBEINGHUMANBEINGBUILDUPITSLIFEANDCREATEITSELFBYCHOICEINTHEVALUEPLURALMODEMSOCIETYPEOPLEENCOUNTEREDTHECOMPLEXITYOFCHOICE，WHILETHEVALUEOFCHOICEISUPGRADEDITISAFUNDAMENTALPROBLEMFOREVERYONETOQUESTIONTHATHOWTOEXHIBITHUMANNATUREBYCHOICESO，MORALEDUCATION，WHICHTAKESSPIRITCIVILIZATIONASITSNATURE，COULDNOTAVOIDCONCERNINGTHEQUESTIONOFCHOICEGUIDINGPEOPLETOMAKEMORALCHOICESHOULDBECOMETHEULTIMATEMISSIONANDPURSUEOFMORALEDUCATIONHOWEVERINTHECOOPERATIONOFMORALRELATIVISM，APPETENCYISMANDINSTRUMENTALRATIONALISM，MORALEDUCATIONDEVIATESFROMITSNATUREOFSPIRITCIVILIZATIONASARESULTMORALEDUCATIONDOESNOTFULFILLITSOBLIGATION，BUTAGGRAVATESTHEABSENCEOFMORALVALUEINCHOICEMORALEDUCATIONWHICHSHOULDUPGRADEHAMANSPIRITLEDTOTHEDEGENERATIONOFHUMANNATUREDOMINATEDBYLECHERYANDPREJUDICE，PEOPLEHAVENOOTHERPURSUEEXCEPTINDULGINGINPRACTICALPROFITIDOLIZINGDOLCEVITASARISFYINGBOURGEOISLIFETHEYTAKETHISLIFEASREALLIFEANDTHEVALUEOFLIFEHUMANBEINGLOSTTHEWILLANDMOTIVETO打ANSCENDENCESO，THELIFEBECOMESCHAOS，OUTOFORDERPERPLEXED，VACUOUSANDHOPELESSTHENATUREOFMORALEDUCATIONDECIDESIT’STHEFUNDAMENTALFORCETOREJECTBOURGEOISANDGUARDIANNOBLENESSMORALEDUCATIONSHOULDSAY‘‘NO”TOBOURGEOISCHOICENEEDEDUCATIONALHORIZONINORDERTOREALIZEITSEDUCATIONALVALUEFREEDOMISONLYTHEPREMISEOFCHOICE，WHICHCOULDNOTGUARANTEENRIGHTCHOICEGOODCONSTRUCTEDUCATIONALHORIZONOFCHOICEONLYINTHEPROCESSOFQUESTIONINGGOODANDBEINGARERGOODCHOICECANMAKEPEOPLEGROWINGONLYINTHEPROCESSOFPURSUINGGOODMORALEDUCATIONCANGUIDEPEOPLECHOICEAWORTHWHILELIFE，ANDPROMOTETHEGROWINGANDPERFECTINGOFMORALSELFCHOICEANDGUIDINGCONSTRUCTTHEPRACTICEOFMORALEDUCATIONCOMMONLYTHEFREEDOMOFCHOICEISTHEPREMISEOFMORALEDUCATIONGUIDEISTHEBASICWAYOFMORALEDUCATIONTHEREISALWAYSATENSIONBETWEENGUIDEANDCHOICE，WHICHEMBODIESTHENECESSITYANDPOSSIBILITOFMORALEDUCATIONMORALEDUCATIONGOESFORWARDUNDERTHETENSIONOWINGTOTHEINEFFICACYOFRULEEDUCTION，MORALEDUCATIONSHOULDTURNTOVIRTUEEDUCATIONVIRTUEEDUCATIONSURPASSESBUTNOTCOMPLETELYDENIESRULEEDUCATIONONLYVIRTUECARLMAKECHOICEBECOMEMORALCHOICEANDGOODCHOICEARISTOTLE’SVIRTUEETHICSISNOTANOUTDATEDTHEORYBUTAWORTHWHILETHEORYFORMODEMMORALEDUCATIONTODRAWENLIGHTENMENTFROMPUBLICLIFEISTHEGROUNDWORKOFPERSONALCHOICE，WHILEITISNECESSARYFORVIRTUEGROWINGITISNOTCORRECTTOREGARDVIRTUEGROWINGASPRIVATEAFFAIRSTURNINGTOLIFEWORLDOFMORALEDUCATIONISNOTTOECHOORDINARYLIFE，BUTSTILLKEEPITSTRANSCENDINGNATUREVIRTUEEDUCATIONPERSEISGOODLIFEMORALEDUCATIONISFULLOFUNKNOWNANDLIKELIHOODMORALEDUCATIONSHOULDGUIDEPEOPLETOMAKEPRUDENTCHOICEANDCHOICEGOODLIFE，SOTOPROMOTETHEGROWTHANDPERFECTIONOFMORALSEL￡EXHIBITTHEEXCELLENCE，PREEMINENCEANDGOODLINESSOFHUMANNATURETHISISTHEOBLIGATIONWHICHMORALEDUCATIONSHOULDFULFILLBUTUNFUFRILLEDKEYWORDSCHOICE；MORALEDUCATION；GOOD；FREEDOM；VIRTUE；MODEMITYII