版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、
The Hebei Spirit oil spill incident that occurred in 2007 produced large oil spill to Yellow Sea. It is estimated that approximately 10,900 tons of crude oil were released from collision between crane barge and lea
2、d tug at Taean on the west coast of the Republic of Korea1. As a result of the incident, the immense expenses concerning economic damages, natural resource damages, cleanup activities, compensation costs, and other oblig
3、ations came out. And in order to receive compensation, a lot of the victims collected evidence for claiming compensation and filed a lawsuit to the court.
Usually, in the oil spill incident like the Hebei Spirit o
4、il spill incident, a lot of issues and problems are raised. For example, in regard to the ship owner’s liability for the oil spill incident, compensation proceedings of catastrophic oil spill, and calculating damages fro
5、m oil spill etc. are raised. Especially, as for the limitation of ship owner, there are problems that the ship owner was negligent or not under the CLC and law when the oil spill incident occurs. And the problem that oth
6、er subjects such as tug or crane barge have a liability to compensation or not is raised too.
And when it comes to the compensation proceedings for oil spill incident, because IOPC Funds requires complicate docume
7、nts as a proofs of damage, many victims are suffering from collecting evidence by themselves and filing a suit. In the case of the Hebei Spirit oil spill incident, many victims had difficulty in finding proofs because of
8、 lack of law regarding it and complicated requirements of IOPC Funds. In addition to this, victims from oil spill incident usually suffered from delay of ruling of court or low rate of the compensation.
As for the
9、 question about psychological damage, generally it is difficult to be admitted as the damages from oil spill incident. It is because to calculate causation between the psychological damage and oil spill incident is hard.
10、 Also, in the case of the fishery without gear’s damage, to submit documents that prove victim’s damages is difficult because the victims don’t have any proofs such as work sheet or receipt usually. For these reason, the
11、 problem related calculating damages is raised.
In addition, in regard to compulsory insurance, victim’s right of direct claim to insurer helps the victims from oil spill incident receive compensation. However, th
12、ere is a problem about acknowledging indemnity of the third party under the law.
This paper aims to review the compensation proceedings in oil spill incidents and relief victims by taking the case of Hebei Spirit
13、oil spill incident in Korea. Especially, it reviews the law concerning oil pollution and compensation, and international convention such as CLC. And it reviews provision of applicable laws and tries to find some limitati
14、ons or problems of the laws in the Hebei Spirit oil spill incident carefully. Also, in order to find the improvements about problems, this paper suggests some directions by studying the problem of law and comparing other
15、 oil spill incident cases or law of other countries.
This paper is largely divided into seven parts:the Hebei Spirit oil spill incident and the Questions raised there from, limitations of liability for oil spill i
16、ncident, compensation proceedings for oil spill incident, calculation of damages for oil spill incident, compulsory insurance for rescuing victims from oil spill incident, improvements of the compensation system, and con
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 食品安全事故中潛在受害者救濟(jì)問(wèn)題研究.pdf
- 海上石油開(kāi)發(fā)污染損害賠償法律制度研究——以墨西哥灣溢油事故和渤海灣溢油事故為視角.pdf
- 大規(guī)模環(huán)境污染侵權(quán)的剖析與賠償機(jī)制研究——以渤海灣溢油事故為例.pdf
- 渤海溢油污染事故生態(tài)損害賠償?shù)姆删葷?jì)問(wèn)題研究.pdf
- 美國(guó)政府應(yīng)對(duì)溢油事件研究——以2010年深水地平線(xiàn)鉆井平臺(tái)溢油事故為例.pdf
- 船舶油污損害賠償法律問(wèn)題研究——以“密斯姆”輪溢油事故為視角.pdf
- 環(huán)境侵權(quán)受害者救濟(jì)制度研究.pdf
- 船舶溢油事故應(yīng)急預(yù)案
- 船舶溢油事故應(yīng)急預(yù)案
- 環(huán)境污染受害者救濟(jì)制度研究.pdf
- 全球海洋溢油事故概述
- 海灣溢油事故損失計(jì)量研究.pdf
- 精神控制受害者或腦電波掃描儀受害者彭宜杉
- 迷人的受害者.pdf
- 港口溢油事故風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估及防范研究.pdf
- 論環(huán)境公益訴訟中的受害者權(quán)益保護(hù).pdf
- 黃浦江溢油事故的數(shù)值模擬研究.pdf
- NOAA-AVHRR數(shù)據(jù)在事故溢油中應(yīng)用研究.pdf
- 船舶溢油事故應(yīng)急反應(yīng)決策研究【開(kāi)題報(bào)告】
- 我國(guó)海洋溢油污染責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)賠償研究:以大連港溢油為例.pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論