the translator’s role in associative motivation

1、<p>　　The Translator’s Role in Associative Motivation</p><p>　　Abstract：The translation of the original is accepted only when it retrieves the certain route or models provided by the original， and devel

2、oped through relevant stimuli</p><p>　　Key words： translator’s style；translator’s association；translation Background</p><p>　　An ideal equivalent translation can never be fulfilled in reality. T

3、he translated version is practically a reproduction embedded with the translator’s style of creativity however with elusive fringe and blurred distinction in which literal or overdone translation both betrays the origina

4、l （Bell， R. 1991）. The dissertation holds the view that the translator’s association is closely connected with the degree of the reproduction which embodies the translator’s style and creativity. The translator’s</p&g

5、t;<p>　　Methodology and problems</p><p>　　The thesis is developed on the ideal assumption that translators give birth to various associations in ideal conditions without the influence of other variabl

6、es， and it is only an attempt on the route and models of translators in the shifting of thoughts. Through tremendous analysis on the translation examples， it is revealed that associative approaches are adopted by transla

7、tors in this or that way in translating process， especially attempting to solve the seemly so-called untranslatability， wh</p><p><b>　　Contents</b></p><p>　　The dissertation is wholl

8、y based on the general understanding of human being， which is the fundamental point of this essay and makes it possible that people of different nationalities can understand each other in general. In the translating proc

9、ess it is found that this or that way of associative approach closely connected with human natural psychological association is consciously or unconsciously adopted by translators， which makes translation agreeable to th

10、e TL readers and helps solve the pr</p><p>　　The translation of the original is accepted only when it retrieves the certain route or models provided by the original， and developed through relevant stimuli； o

11、therwise it is another new version or writing produced by translator.</p><p>　　Bibliography</p><p>　　[1]Baker， M. 1992.In Other Words： a Course Book on Translation.[M]. London： Rutledge.</p&g

12、t;<p>　　[2]Bell， R. 1991.Translation and Translating： Theories and Practice. [M].London： Longman.</p><p>　　[3]Carroll. 1999. Psychology of Language. [M].New York： Brooks/ Cole Publishing Company， D.&l

13、t;/p><p>　　[4]Crystal David. 1985. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. [M].Oxford： Basil Blackwell Ltd.</p><p>　　[5]Ernst August Gutty. 2004.Translation and Relevance — Cognition and Context

14、.[M]。上海：上海外語教育出版社，.</p><p>　　[6]George Yule.2000. Pragmatics [M]。上海：上海外語教育出版社</p><p>　　[7]Geoffrey Leech.1981.Semantics， [M].Penguin Books，</p><p>　　[8]Hudson， Richard. 1986. Word G

15、rammar. [M]. New York： Basil Blackwell Inc.</p><p>　　[9]Peter Newmark. 2001. A Textbook of Translation， [M]。上海：上海外語教育出版社，.</p><p>　　[10]Leech. Geoffrey. 1983. Semantics-The Study of Meaning.[M].

16、England： Penguin Books.</p><p>　　[11]Leo Hinchey. 2001.The Pragmatics of Translation [M]。上海：上海外語教育出版社，</p><p>　　[12]馮慶華，2002，《實(shí)用翻譯教程》[M]。上海：上海外語教育出版社。</p><p>　　[13]劉重德，1991， 《文學(xué)翻譯十講