版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、 The Impact of Emotional Involvement on Moral JudgmentAuthor:Lin Fangfang Tutor:ProfessorLi HonghanMajor:Developmental and Educational Psychology Research Field:Development of CognitonGrade:2007AbstractAccording to the
2、dual-process theory of moral judgment (Greene et al., 2001), bothcognitive factor and emotional factor are the two important factors that affect moral judgment.In the classic trolley dilemma, people tend to sacrifice one
3、 people to save another five. In thissituation, people will weigh the loss – benefit analysis, and based on economic principles, thisjudgment is utilitarian judgment. However, we believe that the emotional factor is equa
4、llyimportant and complicated in the trolley dilemma, and people whose emotional involvement atdifferent levels will make different moral judgments in certain situations. Through controlingthe situation to induce differen
5、t emotions involved, the author attempts to examine the impactof emotional conflict on moral judgment.This study includes three experiments. The author adapts the classical case of the trolleydilemma to control the subje
6、ct's emotional involvement, so as to test subjects' moral judgment.The results showed that:1) In the trolley dilemma, the subject's emotional conflicts will become stronger withmore people in the fork, which
7、will accordingly reverse the utilitarian moral judgment to thenon-utilitarian one.2) Not only the number of the people in the fork affects moral judgment, people's categoryin the fork can impact moral judgment. The c
8、ritical point of the reverse moral response patternvaries with the different categories of people in the fork. When people are workmen, thecritical point is 3; when people are women, the critical point is 2; when the peo
9、ple are pregnant,the critical point is 1.3) When the person in the fork is pregnant which can arouse the subject's strong emotions,and the other emotional factors (for example, whether relatives or not) are not easy
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 情感卷入對道德判斷的影響.pdf
- 愉快、厭惡情緒喚起及個人卷入對道德判斷的影響
- 愉快、厭惡情緒喚起及個人卷入對道德判斷的影響.pdf
- 自我卷入對道德判斷的影響-基于進(jìn)化心理學(xué)視角.pdf
- 判斷視角和道德立場對道德判斷的影響.pdf
- 道德自我對道德判斷的影響.pdf
- 趨避行為對道德判斷的影響
- 自我損耗對道德判斷的影響
- 10836.判斷視角和道德立場對道德判斷的影響(1)
- 近墨者黑:不道德傳染對道德判斷的影響.pdf
- 自我卷入度低與自我卷入度高情境下道德判斷的時程加工特點(diǎn)
- 大學(xué)生道德判斷能力對網(wǎng)絡(luò)利他行為的影響:網(wǎng)絡(luò)道德情感的中介作用
- 心理距離對道德判斷的影響.pdf
- 趨避行為對道德判斷的影響.pdf
- 自我損耗對道德判斷的影響.pdf
- 解釋水平對道德判斷的影響.pdf
- 厭惡共情對道德判斷的影響
- 群體關(guān)注對道德判斷的影響.pdf
- 催產(chǎn)素對道德判斷的影響
- 金錢概念啟動對道德判斷的影響
評論
0/150
提交評論