法律父愛主義視野下的公民隱私權(quán)保護(hù)機(jī)制研究——以林文川案為對(duì)象的分析.pdf

1、分類號(hào)UDC學(xué)號(hào)叢墨1415墾密級(jí)埸H1大譬YANGZHOUUNIVERSITY碩士學(xué)位論文(全日制專業(yè)學(xué)位)法律父愛主義視野下的公民隱私權(quán)保護(hù)機(jī)制研究——以林文川案為對(duì)象的分析陳瑩指導(dǎo)教師姓名：送盎塹撞：揚(yáng)劌盤莖，姿蒸塹州：225QQ窆!星垂基，蒸劌立厶＆撿窒墮：壟菱菱劌：21QQ壘申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：論文提交日期：學(xué)位授予單位：亟學(xué)科專業(yè)名稱：送堡亟(韭鎏堂2至Q]Z生月!Q蘭論文答辯日期：2Q]Z生墨月2】旦揚(yáng)劌盤堂學(xué)位授予日期：2Q]

2、Z生魚月3Q旦2017年6月AbstractTherightofprivacyisthesignificantelementtomaintainthefreedomofpersonalityandpersonaldignityItisalsotheprerequisitetomaintainpersonalityindependenceAsthenationalpublicpowerexpandingandthegovernmental

3、powersinfiltrating，thesituationsthatpublicpowerfrequentlyintervenetheexerciseofcitizens’personalprivacyhappenoccasionallyThelawoughttobalancetheinterestsappealoftheconflictsanddelimitaboundarylinereasonablybetweentheexer

4、ciseofcitizens’personalprivacyandtheinterventionofpublicpowerThetheoreticalframeworkoflegalpaternalismprovidesthepossibilitytosolvetheconflictTheessaytakesthecaseofLinWenchuanastheentrypoint，throughanalyzingthefingerprin

5、tinterestcharacteristicandthelegitimacyoffingerprintcollectionfromtheperspectiveofpaternalismwhichareinvolvedinthecase’SfocustoproposethedilemmaoftheprotectionofprivacyrightTheessaytakespaternalismasthetoolofanalyzingand

6、makesuggestionstoperfecttheprotectionsystemofprivacyrightTheessayincludesfourparts：ThefirstpartisthefocusofdisputeinthecaseofLinWenchuanThispartintroducesthecaseofLinWenchuanandsummarizesthefocusofdisputeinthiscaseThenth

7、ispartanalyzesthesubstantialattributeoffingerprintinterestandthelegitimacyofpaternalisticfingerprintcollectionThesecondpartistheanalysisofthelegalissuesinthecaseThroughtheanalysisofthesubstanceofthecasetodrawforththebasi

8、cdefinitionoftheprivacyrightandthesubstanceoflegalpaternalism，andarguesthevalueandlimitationoftheinterventionofprivacycausedbylegalpaternalismThethirdpartistheprotectiondilemmaofprivacyrightinChinaThispartcomprehensively

9、analyzestheexistingproblemsintheprotectionofprivacyrightfromtheperspectivesofthelackofprivacyrightslawmaking，theborder—crossingexerciseofpublicpowerandthelackofreliefprotectionThispartmakespacefortheinterventionandthesol

10、utionofpaternalismTheforthpartistheprotectionmechanismofprivacyrightunderthelegalpaternalismThispartproposesthespecificperfectionoftheexistingproblemsmentionedinthethirdpartFirst，fromtheperspectiveofthelawmaking，thispart