2023年全國(guó)碩士研究生考試考研英語(yǔ)一試題真題(含答案詳解+作文范文)_第1頁(yè)
已閱讀1頁(yè),還剩69頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、重慶大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文多項(xiàng)選擇聽(tīng)力測(cè)試題結(jié)構(gòu)效度追述法研究姓名:鄭宇靜申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專(zhuān)業(yè):外國(guó)語(yǔ)言學(xué)及應(yīng)用語(yǔ)言學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:辜向東20060401重慶大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文 ABSTRACT IIABSTRACT This thesis “A retrospection study on the construct validity of mul

2、tiple-choice (MC) listening comprehension tests” explores the construct validity of MC listening comprehension tests through examining the test-taking processes of test-takers. The construct validity of MC listening comp

3、rehension tests is defined as the extent to which the tests measure the right listening constructs or abilities they intend to measure. The research focuses on the following three research questions: 1) what constructs a

4、re tested in the MC listening comprehension tests; 2) how the constructs are tested in the MC listening comprehension tests; and 3) what effects the MC format has on test-takers’ performance. To answer these questions, r

5、etrospective verbal report methodology is employed and eight Chinese EFL test-takers are involved in the study. The major findings of the present study are briefly summarized as follows: First, the grammatical knowledge

6、 and discourse knowledge of language competence and all the cognitive and metacognitive strategies proposed in the framework of listening constructs are measured in the MC listening comprehension tests, which supports th

7、e construct validity of the tests. But the MC listening comprehension tests may have some defects to measure test-takers’ pragmatic and sociolinguistic knowledge, which threatens their construct validity to some extent.

8、Second, the characteristics of test-takers’ application of knowledge and various strategies in their test-taking processes are revealed as follows: 1) such characteristics as compensation and using the internal context a

9、re found with their application of language knowledge; 2) background knowledge is applied by test-takers to infer the meaning of unknown vocabulary and sometimes to guess the answer of the test item; 3) some strategies,

10、such as inferencing, prediction, contextualization and reconstruction facilitate test-takers’ listening comprehension, while the translation and visualization strategies actually slow down the listening process. Third, s

11、uch three effects as superficial matching, reading and uninformed guessing of the MC format are investigated, which also threatens the construct validity of the MC listening comprehension tests. In addition, the influenc

12、es of the long dialogue input are also revealed, providing some insights for the application of the input to listening comprehension tests. Keywords: Construct validity, MC listening comprehension tests, Retrospection

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論