版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、湘潭大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文論發(fā)回重審——以中部地區(qū)某中級(jí)法院為考察對(duì)象姓名:呂鳴申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專業(yè):法律·民事訴訟法指導(dǎo)教師:廖永安20071001IIABSTRACT As an important litigation institution,sending back retries a case is the directest and concretest embody of the hi
2、gher court exercising the power of judge surpervision. Its aim is to pretect the judge's justice. But in late years,theory and practice circles raise a query for this institution. Looking
3、from the judicial practice,the institution has many defect. The lesgislative backward causes the institution can't adapt the situational development. Specific standards for a relatively vague, lack of
4、objectivity, and resulted in remandment during the actual operation of instability and randomness. Sending back retries a case disobey the demand of justice and efficiency. It causes the litigation comes
5、back to the initiative state. The procedure repeatition causes many cases can't have a conclusion for many years. The quality of remedy which sending back retries a case embody is passive.
6、 It should come back to the lower court,and the judge function of the higher court is unoccupied. Sending back retries a case can't be recoursed to law,so it is not supervisory. The cur
7、rent law has not regulated any mechanism to evaluate itself correct or not. Without the supervision ,it can cause the judicial corruptness. The article analyses the moving condition of the institution in
8、 judicial practice throngh carring out investigation and study,and excavates the system problem and comes up personal advice ,in order to perfect the civil procedure and promote the judicial just
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 我國(guó)域內(nèi)民事送達(dá)制度研究——以中部地區(qū)的某中級(jí)法院為考察對(duì)象.pdf
- 我國(guó)法院調(diào)解制度的透視與重塑——以湖南省中部地區(qū)某基層法院為考察對(duì)象.pdf
- 論民事案件的發(fā)回重審.pdf
- 論民事訴訟發(fā)回重審制度.pdf
- 《訴訟費(fèi)用交納辦法》運(yùn)行實(shí)證考評(píng)——以湖南某經(jīng)濟(jì)欠發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)中級(jí)法院為考察對(duì)象.pdf
- 我國(guó)民事再審程序的改革與完善——以中部地區(qū)某市中級(jí)人民法院為考察對(duì)象.pdf
- 民事再審發(fā)回重審制度研究.pdf
- 論我國(guó)刑事發(fā)回重審.pdf
- 關(guān)于鶴壁法院民事發(fā)回重審案件的調(diào)研報(bào)告.pdf
- 刑事發(fā)回重審制度研究.pdf
- 論發(fā)回重審制度——民事訴訟角度的思考.pdf
- 民事發(fā)回重審的實(shí)證調(diào)研.pdf
- 刑事發(fā)回重審制度探析——以刑事司法救濟(jì)程序?yàn)榭蚣?pdf
- 論刑事訴訟中的發(fā)回重審制度.pdf
- 新中國(guó)的發(fā)回重審制度研究.pdf
- 程序性違法發(fā)回重審制度研究.pdf
- 民事訴訟發(fā)回重審制度實(shí)證分析.pdf
- 我國(guó)發(fā)回重審制度的改革研究.pdf
- 刑事二審發(fā)回重審制度研究.pdf
- 民事二審發(fā)回重審制度研究.pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論