程度副詞“很”、“極”、“死”、“壞”研究.pdf

1、上海師范大學碩士學位論文程度副詞“很”、“極”、“死”、“壞”研究姓名：李永斗申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：語言學及應用語言學指導教師：齊滬揚20050501AbstractionThisthesisdiscussesthesimilarityanddiferenceamongfourrelatedadverbs’‘很，，、“極，’、“死，，、“壞，ofmodemChinese.Grammaticalizationtheoryisalsous

2、edtogivearudimentaldiachronicexplanatory.Therearefivemorepartsinthethesisbesidestheintroduction.Focusedonbeingafullandaccuratedescriptionofthedistributionofthesefoureasilyentangledadverbsthisthesisusescomparativemethodto

3、showtheirsubtlesimilarityanddiferenceandtrytoexplainthemfromadiachronicviewwishingtobeusefulreferenceforthosewhotakeChineseasasecondlanguage.Intheintroductiontheauthorlooksbacktheproductionandproblemsstillexistedinthisfi

4、eldandpointsoutthatforthosewhotakeChineseasasecondlanguagethedescriptionexistedisnotfullandaccurateenoughshowingtheimportancetoconstituteafullrangedcomparison.Thesourceofexamplesinthisthesisandthethoughtinwritingthisthes

5、isarealsoshowninthispart.PartonegivesaroundeddistributionofthesefouradverbsinmodernChineseforthosewhotakeChineseasasecondlanguageandpaysalotofattentiontotheplacewheretheycanoccur.theconstraintwhentheycoincidewithverbsand

6、adjectives(especiallythegrammaticalroletheycanplayinasentencetherestrictiononsyllableandsemanticcharacteristicofrelatedverbsandadjectives).Parttwotakesacomparativeviewonthesimilarityanddiferenceamongthesefourrelatedadver

7、bsrespectivelyandaguesthattheheterogeneityoftheirsemantictraitsandgrammaticaljzedlevelresultsinthem.Partthreeisaconclusionoftheaforementionedcomparisoninthreepartsandarguesthatitisthediferentstartpointoftheirgrammaticali

8、zationthatgiveintotheirsimilarityanddiferenceinmodernChinese.PartfourstudiessomegrammaticalizationevolvementrelatedtothesefouradverbsincludingthediferencebetweentheadverbsusedinancientChineseandthoseinmodernChinese.thegr