2023年全國碩士研究生考試考研英語一試題真題(含答案詳解+作文范文)_第1頁
已閱讀1頁,還剩12頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

1、第 1 頁,共 13 頁高考英語模擬試卷 高考英語模擬試卷 題號 I II III IV V VI 總分得分一、閱讀理解(本大題共 15 小題,共 30.0 分)AHere are some professions Americans consider to be the most honest. Maybe the rest of us can learn from what these people do to establish

2、 good relationships with others. MEDICAL DOCTORS Jack Jacoub Age: 44, Fountain Valley, California I try to introduce myself in a pleasant way. I sit down; I don't stand. I make good eye contact with the patient and h

3、is or her family. Communication skills are key, as well as showing understanding and availability.For a physician, the single most rewarding thing is when someone who has seen your work chooses you. ENGINEERS Chrissy Kea

4、ne Age: 41, Crofton, Maryland I don't know that being an engineer means you are automatically trustworthy. However, I do think that most engineers like to follow rules and be organized. They tell you what they think,

5、 whether you want to hear it or not. Those are important elements in building trust. POLICE OFFICERS G. M. Cox Age: 64, Fort Worth, Texas As a police officer, I have the best interests of the people I serve in my heart a

6、nd in my actions and I'm going to treat everyone the same way. I always want to go up to people and speak to them with respect.don't talk down to them.You have to establish and maintain that trust. Be equal!1. Wh

7、at does Jack Jacoub think important to do his job? ______ A. Being communicative. B. Experience.C. Self-introduction. D. Being open-minded.2. How does G M. Cox treat people in his job ______ A. Strictly. B. Cautiously. C

8、. Equally D. Actively3. What do they have in common? ______ A. They are warmhearted. B. They deserve trust.C. They follow rules. D. They are good organizers.BThe secret to living longer could be as simple as picking up y

9、our walking pace, according to a new study.Researchers from the University of Sydney found that walking at a brisk(快的)or fast pace was associated with a risk reduction of 24 percent for any cause of death. This effect wa

10、s even more obvious in older age group, with fast walkers over the age of 60 reducing their risk of death by a surprising 53 percent. Professor Emmanuel Stamatakis, who led the study, explained, “A fast pace is generally

11、 five to six kilometers per hour, but it really depends on a walker's fitness levels; an alternatives indicator is to walk at a pace that makes you slightly out of breath or sweaty.“ In the study, the researchers loo

12、ked at the results of 11 surveys from 1994 to 2008, in which participants recorded their walking pace, as well as age, sex and BMI. The 第 3 頁,共 13 頁morning,' or whenever, which causes a shift from it,“ he told the BB

13、C. “That means moving people from larger vehicles into smaller ones, which means more vehicles to move the same people. Therefore, more traffic.“ Data gathered about ride-sharing drivers illustrates how they contribute t

14、o congestion(塞車), said Prof. Christo Wilson, a computer scientist at Northeastern University who has studied the services.“You can look at the traffic pattern for the Uber vehicles and it perfectly matches the peaks for

15、the rush hour and the peak time of a day, “ he said.They are out there in force at the worst possible times.8. What can we know about the cabs in New York? ______ A. More cabs are needed to meet the demand.B. They often

16、tour around the city seeking users.C. Their fares increased greatly over the four years.D. The number of them is far less than ride-sharing cars.9. What is Christo Wilson's attitude toward ride-sharing practice? ____

17、__ A. Neutral B. Negative C. Indifferent D. Supportive10. Which of the following best replaces “it“ underlined in Paragraph 5. ______ A. A jam. B. Public transportC. A car. D. A ride-sharing vehicle.11. What is the best

18、title for the text? ______ A. Worse Road Jams. B. App Makes Terrible Jams.C. Efforts Needed for Traffic. D. Technology Counts in Future.DThroughout our daily lives, we have known plenty of people and will know more.But h

19、ow can we tell if someone is trustworthy? In a paper published recently in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, researcher gave us the answer. The researchers asked 401 adults from the United States to fill

20、out a questionnaire measuring their guilt-proneness(內(nèi)疚傾向) in different situations as well as several other qualities, and then play a short online game. In this game, Player 1 is given $1, which they can choose to give t

21、o Player 2. Any money given to Player 2 is then automatically increased to ﹩2.50.Player 2 can then decide whether to keep all of the money or behave in a trustworthy way by returning a portion of the money to Player 1.Th

22、e researchers found more guilt-prone people were more likely to share the money with Player 1. Actually, in follow-up studies,guilt-proneness predicted trustworthiness better than other personality qualities the research

23、ers measured. Why might guilt lead to trustworthy behavior? The researchers found people who were guilt-prone also reported feeling an obligation to act in ethical(合乎道德的) and responsible ways while interacting(互動) with t

24、heir partners in the game. People who are guilt-prone tend to avoid engaging in behavior that might harm or disappoint others. If they do something bad, guilt encourages them to try to make things right again. Then, how

25、can we use this research to ascertain whether someone is trustworthy? “One way to do this might be observe how they respond to experience regret,“ lead author Emma Levine, assistant professor at the University of Chicago

26、 Levine, explains.Another way is to ask them to describe a difficult dilemma they faced in the past, suggests co-author Taya Cohen, associate professor at Carnegie Mellon University. This is particularly effective, Cohen

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論