版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、湘潭大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文盧梭道德教育思想及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值姓名:馬暢申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專(zhuān)業(yè):馬克思主義理論與思想政治教育指導(dǎo)教師:范賢超20080601Abstract Abstract In the history of western ideology, Jean-Jacques Rousseau is never neglectable. His thoughts, inculding moral education, have profo
2、und significance not only in the past, but also in the contemporary society. His theory of moral education starts from his understanding to humanity and its development. Starting from the origin of human beings, he assum
3、es a state of nature and endows the natural person with moral meaning, from which, he draws out natural humantity, on which his moral education theory is based. According to Rousseau, human civilization is far from natur
4、e, and humanity deviates from its origin, which, as a kind of alienation and deviation, is overcame through moral education. After the decription of alienation resulted from science and rationality, he established a mora
5、l community. Moral education, which works as a bridge between alienation and morality, finds necessaty of its existence. Naturalist humanity views causes Rousseau’s developing different principles, aims and methods in hi
6、s theory of moral education. Rousseau also regards that the aim of moral education is to revert the humanity and release the human beings. In such a perspctive, the target of moral education is to bring forward new natur
7、al person, namely citizen. The double meaning of civilian in moral and politics requires, on the one side,a steady community of moral education in order to guarantee freedom in politics; on the other side, culturation of
8、 self-will in order to achieve moral libration. Rousseau’s theory of moral education displays unresovable dilema in the educational system in which both tasks co-exist, mainly manifested in the following aspects as the
9、conflict between self-will and social identification, and that between natural education and public education. The production of dilemas is inherently connected with phylosophical and politic thoughts, as well as influen
10、ces from historical environment and personal experiences. There are some problems in modern moral education concerning moral concepts, moral education practice, as well as moral education achievement. Confronted with the
11、se problems, we can get lots of helpful enlightenment from Rousseau’s moral educational thought and dilema, which is also the significance of moral education in contemporary society. Not only effects of social public mor
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 盧梭道德教育思想及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值.pdf
- 孔子道德教育思想及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值.pdf
- 弗洛姆的道德教育思想及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值.pdf
- 孟子道德教育思想及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值研究.pdf
- 道家生態(tài)道德教育思想及其現(xiàn)代價(jià)值
- 朱熹道德教育思想及其現(xiàn)代價(jià)值研究.pdf
- 孔子道德教育思想及其現(xiàn)代價(jià)值研究.pdf
- 道家生態(tài)道德教育思想及其現(xiàn)代價(jià)值.pdf
- 論道家道德教育方法及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值.pdf
- 朱熹《家訓(xùn)》道德教育思想及其現(xiàn)代價(jià)值研究.pdf
- 盧梭道德教育思想概論.pdf
- 40039.盧梭兒童美育思想及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值研究
- 盧梭“消極教育”思想及其當(dāng)代教育價(jià)值.pdf
- 盧梭的道德教育思想探究.pdf
- 儒家的道德人格思想及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值
- 儒家的道德人格思想及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值.pdf
- 洛克與盧梭家庭道德教育思想的比較及其啟示
- 荀子的道德教化思想及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值.pdf
- 孟子道德教化思想及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值研究.pdf
- 尊重天性培育德性——盧梭道德教育思想探析
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論