利用牙鲆鰓細(xì)胞FG和斑馬魚胚胎對氨基甲酸酯類殺蟲劑殘殺威和西維因的細(xì)胞毒性、遺傳毒性和致畸性的毒性評估研究.pdf_第1頁
已閱讀1頁,還剩152頁未讀 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

1、Two carbamate insecticides, propoxur and carbaryl, having a wide spectrum ofapplications, have intensified the risk of exposure to non-target organisms due totheir indiscriminate use. Propoxur (2-isopropoxyphenyl methylc

2、arbamate) is usedthroughout the world as insecticides, herbicides, nematocides, acaricides, fungicides,rodenticides, avicides, and bird repellents with their application in a wide variety ofhabitats including agricultura

3、l lands, forests, rangelands, wetlands, residential areas,and commercial sites. Carbaryl (1-naphthyl-N-methylcarbamate), the most frequentlyused insecticide in the carbamate chemical family, is widely used for the contro

4、l of avariety of pests on fruits, vegetables, cereals, forage, cotton, forests. lawns,ornamentals and many other crops as well as poultry, livestock and pets. The toxicmode of action of carbamate insecticides for animals

5、 is the inhibition of the enzymeacetylcholinesterase (AChE) at synaptic junctions in the nervous system, resulting inthe accumulation of acetylcholine in the nerve synapses, causing uncontrolledmovement, paralysis, convu

6、lsions, tetany, and possible death. In addition, bothinsecticides have also been shown to be toxic to non-target species like honeybees,amphibians, birds, fishes and even mammals including humans, though their toxicityva

7、ries according to the species.
  Toxicity of pesticides on non-target organisms and ecosystems is of worldwideconcern. The widespread applications of these carbamates have attracted increasingconcerns on the safety of

8、 aquatic organisms as this pesticide eventually ends up intothe aquatic environment. Fish are an important population of the aquatic ecosystemsand often used for monitoring toxicity in the aquatic environments. Accumulat

9、ingevidences showed that propoxur is moderately to slightly toxic to freshwater fishwhereas carbaryl can range from highly to slightly toxic to freshwater fish on anacute basis and is moderately toxic to ocean and estuar

10、y fish.
  The main purpose of the present study was to examine the toxic effects of bothcarbamate insecticides propoxur and carbaryl in the in vitro cultured FG cells and zebrafish embryos with a view to record their

11、cytotoxicity, genotoxicity andteratogenicity. In specific, in vitro studies were performed using FG cell line todetermine the cytotoxic effects of both insecticides by MTT reduction, neutral reduptake (NRU), lactate dehy

12、drogenase (LDH) release, and Hoechst 33342 andpropidium iodide (PI) double staining assays; genotoxic effects was evaluated bycomet assay. The embryotoxicity test dealt with the assessment of these carbamatesin developin

13、g zebrafish embryos by observing diverse general morphologicalendpoints. This work has been focused on various aspects of toxicity measurementsof both insecticides to FG cells and zebrafish embryos, which may provideinfo

14、rmation relevant to other carbamate insecticides.
  Both propoxur and carbaryl treatments were seen to inhibit the proliferation ofFG cells in a dose-dependent manner, indicating a decrease in the viability of FG cell

15、swith an increase in insecticides concentrations. The MTT, NRU and LDH releaseassays results demonstrated that both compounds exerted acute cytotoxic effects onFG cells, showing 24h-IC50values of 89.96±1.04μg/ml, 103.4±1

16、.14 μg/ml and86.59±1.13 μg/ml, respectively for propoxur, whereas 53.48±1.21μg/ml, 59.13±1.19μg/ml and 46.21±1.24μg/ml, respectively for carbaryl. The results showed thatLDH leakage and MTT assay were more sensitive than

17、 NRU assay in the cytotoxicitydetection of exposed FG cells to both insecticides. The different mechanisms oftoxicity detection for these assays and the toxic mechanism of action of insecticidesin FG cells may account fo

18、r the different sensitivity. LDH leakage assay detected thereleased LDH enzymes from the dead cells upon loss of their membrane integrity bytoxicants. However, MTT assay determined the perturbation of the mitochondrialfu

19、nction of live cells caused by toxicants, whereas NRU assay detected the loss oflysosomal activity of live cells. But the NR accrual and retention were also dependenton intact plasma membrane and adequate energy metaboli

20、sm in addition to afunctional lysosome. Thus, the interruption of mitochondrial function and injury ofmembrane integrity by both insecticides may to some degree resulted in a relativelylower sensitivity of NRU assay.

21、  Taken together, both propoxur and carbaryl imposed acute cytotoxicity on FGcells, and the order of sensitivity for these three assays, based on their 24 h-IC50values obtained, was LDH> MTT> NRU. In addition, the obtain

22、ed cytotoxicity by bothinsecticides in FG cells was closely correlated in all these assays, independent of thecytotoxic endpoints employed.
  The data by LDH release assay were further confirmed by examining themorpho

23、logical changes of the exposed FG cells. Obvious morphological changes wereobserved in the FG cells after exposed to 100 μg/ml and above for propoxur, whereas25 μg/ml and above for carbaryl after 24 h. The data revealed

24、that the release of LDHhad happened before observable morphological changes occurred in exposed FGcells to propoxur but it happened simultaneously with the obvious morphologicalchanges for carbaryl. With further increase

25、 of the concentration of these compounds,the treated cells started to shrink and distort into irregular shape, and eventuallydetached from the substrate surface and lysed.
  Based on the observations of the morphology

26、 of FG cells and intensity of blueand red fluorescence of the nuclei of FG cells as determined by Hoechst 33342 andpropidium iodide (PI) double staining assay, the toxicity of both insecticides was seenmanifested in term

27、s of necrosis and in a dose-dependent way rather than apoptosissince apoptotic cells were noticed sparsely. Significant cell damages were observedafter 24 h exposure at the concentration of ≥ 100 μg/ml for propoxur and ≥

28、 10 μg/mlfor carbaryl (p<0.05).
  DNA fragmentation assay revealed that there was no effect of these insecticideson the DNA integrity of FG cells as no obvious DNA laddering was induced by bothinsecticides tested in t

29、he FG cells.
  Further, the results obtained in the genotoxicity evaluation of both insecticidesby comet assay showed that propoxur can induce weak DNA damage in exposed FGcells in a dose-dependent manner at levels fr

30、om 10–75 μg/ml of propoxur, however,it was found non-significant up to 20 μg/ml concentration of carbaryl. The DNAdamage scores and the results of propoxur demonstrated that the damage gradeswere not significantly differ

31、ent from the control (p> 0.05) up to 50 μg/ml and a littledose-effect relationship was evident. Though not statistically significant up to 50μg/ml propoxur, the cells were affected the most at a concentration of 75 μg/ml

32、. Butthe damage grades were not significantly different from the control (p> 0.05) at allthe tested concentrations of carbaryl, though a little dose-effect relationship wasevident.
  The results of genotoxic response

33、for the time-dependent exposure to 50μg/mlpropoxur, based on the concentration that produced similar cytotoxicity, from 3–96 hin FG cells demonstrated that the DNA damage increased with the increase of theexposure period

34、s to propoxur up to certain level. Significant DNA damage was seenfrom 24–96 h of exposure as compared with the control (p<0.05). But carbaryldemonstrated no statistically significant genotoxic effects at all the testedc

35、oncentrations and time of exposure (p>0.05).
  In addition, the concentration responsive endpoints analyzed in all the tests inFG cells indicated that the significant toxic effects at all the concentrations testedwere

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評論

0/150

提交評論