國(guó)際投資領(lǐng)域中的間接征收認(rèn)定問(wèn)題——以國(guó)際投資仲裁實(shí)踐為著眼點(diǎn).pdf

1、碩士學(xué)位論文國(guó)際投資領(lǐng)域中的間接征收認(rèn)定問(wèn)題國(guó)際投資領(lǐng)域中的間接征收認(rèn)定問(wèn)題————以國(guó)際投資仲裁實(shí)踐為著眼點(diǎn)以國(guó)際投資仲裁實(shí)踐為著眼點(diǎn)Indirectexpropriationinthefieldoftheinternationalinvestmentatthestartingpointofinternationalinvestmentarbitrationpractice作者姓名：譚晶指導(dǎo)教師：徐泉教授西南政法大學(xué)Southwest

2、UniversityofPoliticalScienceLawAbstractFinveststhebiggestriskcanbefeseenisheldinthefactythecompanyisexpropriation.Butgenerallyisnotillegalftheexpropriationofinternationallawitselfexceptfcertainrequirements.Nowthefollowin

3、gelementscanbeclearedinalmostalloftheinvestmentagreementsnamelyinpublicpurposenondiscriminatybylegalmeanstopaycompensation.Butwhatisoftendisputedintheinvestmentagreementsisnotwhetherthegovernment?sactionistomeettheabovef

4、ourelementsbutwhetherthegovernment?sbehaviitselfcanbecalled”expropriation”.Ifitcanbethegovernmentmustgiveinvestsstardofcompensationstipulatedintheinvestmentagreements.whattobecomeaproblemisnotthebehavithatdirectlyobtains

5、thepropertyoftheinvestsbutmainlytheacquiringpropertybehaviinanyotherpurposes.Althoughtherearealwaysalotofcontroversiesonthebalancesofinvestmentpropertyprotectionmaintainingfreedomofgovernmentregulationimplementbetweenreq

6、uirementsthereisstillnoactualdisputetojudgeconceptcombing.Thepapermainlydiscussestheattitudetoinvestmentagreementsarbitrationawardfindirectdeterminations.Thearticleismainlymadeupbyintroductionbodycompositionconcretelyinc

7、ludingthefollowingaspects:Inthefirstpartthroughthegraspingoftracestothesourcesofthepresentresearchsituationathomeabroadinthefieldofinternationalinvestmentindirectexpropriationproblemswedistinguishseveralcommonlyusedconce

8、ptions.PreliminarysuggestionswereputfwardonindirectdeterminationstardsofexplationsInthesecondpartthroughthearbitrationsthatwereidentifiedfindirectexpropriationintheinternationalinvestmentareaswedefinethemainstardsofarbit

9、rationtribunalfindirectexpropriationInthethirdpartwesummarizethelegalbasisfindirectexpropriationwiththeaidofthearbitrationexpropriationsnotberegardedasindirectonesInthefourthpartweaimatthecurrentstatusofBITputfwardthecre