我國群體訴訟制度研究.pdf

1、復旦大學碩士學位論文我國群體訴訟制度研究姓名：施立功申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：法律指導教師：章武生20071022【摘要】我國代表人訴訟制度在實際運行中存在的弊端已引起理論界和實務界的反思。筆者希望通過自己的研究，就完善我國的群體訴訟制度提出自己的構想。全文共分四章，第一章著重闡述群體訴訟的概念、特征、并對群體訴訟的公正價值和效益價值進行分析：第二章分別介紹美國的集團訴訟、日本的選定當事人訴訟、德國的團體訴訟的特點，在此基礎上比較分析我國

2、代表人訴訟制度與國外群體訴訟制度的異同，揭示我國的代表人訴訟借鑒了日本選定當事人制度的訴訟代表制，同時又對選定當事人制度加以改造吸收的內(nèi)在特征：第三章分析我國群體訴訟制度及其運行現(xiàn)狀。客觀的指出我國代表人訴訟存在的價值意義后，重點分析我國群體訴訟運行中存在的弊端；第四章提出筆者的主張：通過借鑒國外已成熟的群體訴訟制度并結(jié)合我國在群體訴訟方面已取得經(jīng)驗，重構我國的群體訴訟制度?！娟P鍵詞】群體訴訟集團訴訟代表人訴訟重構[中圖分類號】D925

3、1[Abstract]ThedefectsofChina’Srepresentativelawsuitsystem，whichexistsinitsoperation，havecausedreflectionsbyboththetheoristsandpractitionersinthelegalcircleTheauthorhopedthroughownresearchconsummatesourcountry’acommunityI

4、awsuitsystemtoproposeownconceptionThefuIItextaItogetherdiVidesfourchaptersThefirstchapterexpoundsthedefinition，featuresofcommunitylawsuit，andconductsallanalysisoffairvalueandeffectivenessofcommunitylawsuitChapter11analyz

5、esofthefeaturesoftheUScommunitylawsuittheJapanesepartyspecifiedlawsuitandtheGermanycommunitylawsuitBasedOnthis，chapterIImakesacomparativeanalysisofthesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenChina’Srepresentativelawsuitsystemand

6、theoverseascommunitylawsuitsystemanddiscoverstheessentialfeaturesofChina’Srepresentativelawsuitsystem：itabsorbedideasfromJapaneseparty—specifiedlawsuitsystemandadaptedtheJapanesesystemforitsownu∞ChapterIIIanalyzesChina’s

7、currentcommunitylawsuitsystemanditsstatusquoAfteranobjectiveanalysisofChina’SrepresentativethischapterfocusesontheanalysisofthedefectsinChina’ScommunitylawsuitsystemChapterIVanalyzesthefeasibilityandnecessityofabsorbingt

8、heUScommunitylawsuitsystemandpresentstheauthor’Sidea：toUSetheUScommunitylawsuitsystemandtheGermanycommunitylawsuitsystemforreferencetoimproveChina’Scommunitylawsuitsystem[Keywords]thegrouplitigation，groupdisputerepresent