版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
1、南京師范大學博士學位論文教育自由及其限度姓名:周興國申請學位級別:博士專業(yè):教育學原理指導教師:金生鈜20070529AbstractThethemeofthethesisfocusesondiscussingfreedomandlimitationproblemexistinginChild—educationsystemTherearetwoaspectsofmeaningwithrespecttofreedomofchildedu
2、cation:firstasbeingeducatedonechildcouldbefreefromsomelimitation&restrietionandavoidinappropriateinterferencefrompedagogues;second,onechildiscapabletoactfreelyanddowhattheywantThjsmeansthatachildcouldinvolveinthebasicedu
3、cationprovidedbythesocietyAstheconceptofrightkeepsdevelopingnowadays,andbeginstoenterintoeducationsystem,freedomofachild,existingineducation,hasbeencognizedgraduallyWhentheconceptofrightentersintoeducationfield,theconcep
4、toffreedomcomeaboutandhasbeenbeingestablishedgraduallytherebyandithasbroughtintonewdiscussionsabouttherational姆ofcompulsiveeducationEducationhasbeendefinedtobeakindofcompulsiveconception(educationisequivalenttocompulsion
5、)thereforetheremightbeconflictstakingplacelogicallybetweeneducationandpassivefreedomTheseconflictsgobetweenadultsandchildrenideelityandfreedom,aswellasgoodnessandfreedometcHoweveritdoesriotmeanttlatfreedomofeducationissh
6、ortofrationalitynmvalueofsuchkindoffl倒omexistingineducation,couldberepresentedasthatitcouldprovideachildwithpossibilityofcharacteristicdevelopmentMeanwhilefreedomhascloserelationwithequivalent,justice,obligationandorderw
7、ithrespecttoeducationAchild’sbasicfreedom,existingineducation,mainlyincludestwoaspects:(i)asforthepositivemeaningoffreedomitallowsachildtotakepartineducatingaction;(i)asforthepassivemeaningoffreedom,itcausesachildtogetaw
8、ayfrominterferenceandcompulsion,anditismadeupofthoughtfreedomandaction—freedomInthepracticinghistoryofhumaneducation,therearctwokindsofextremityformsexistinginchildeducation:lackfreedomandoverereedomAchild’sbasicfreedomi
9、neducationrequiresthatpedagoguesgiveuptraditionaleducatingandmanagingmethods,tomakeeducationmoreinstructional,b珥notcompulsiveAchlidseducationfreedomisalsestrictedwhichwillprovidecompulsionofeducationwithreasonableassural
10、lceⅥ,11enachildsfreedomgoesbeyondthisrestriction,negativeeffectswillbebroughttoeducationorders,interestofotherpersonsandthechildhimselfandatthismomenlpedagoguesshallhavetoadoptanappropriatecompulsivemethodtestoresuchkind
11、offreedomtoitscorrectstateHoweverthisdoesnotmeanthatpedagogues’compulsivemalLrlerwillnotbelimitedInfacttheyshouldkeeptheconceptoffreedomtoleadthechildt0realizerightsofotherpeopleAndtheyalsoshouldtreatthechildwithforgivin
12、gheartsAseducationfreedomdevelopsfromconceptualformtopracticableform,itsfeasibilitywillrelyontheprocedurethroughwhichtheconceptofgoodnessdiffersfromsingletocommonmeanwhileeducationshallbetakenasareflectionofpublicwilloft
13、hesocietyThereforeeducationfreedomisnecessarytomeettherequirementofcommongoodnessandpublicwillItisexecutableforeducationfreedomtoreachpracticeform,andunderthiseducatingconcⅪ鷗assuranceoffreedomgrantstherighttobepriorwithr
14、especttogoodnessFreedomeducationacceptscompulsiveeducationtherein。butitwillnotbeimplementedbythecompulsivemannerHoweverestablishmentoffreedomconceptineducationwillbethebasicassur∞ceOnlybycarryingoutfreedomconceptinthebas
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 教育自由及其限度(1)
- 勞動合同自由及其限度研究.pdf
- 大學生消極自由及其限度.pdf
- 論法官自由裁量權(quán)及其限度.pdf
- 教師課堂教學自由及其限度研究.pdf
- 學習自由限度之研究.pdf
- 植入廣告表達自由的法律限度.pdf
- 商業(yè)性表達自由的限度.pdf
- 沉默及其限度
- 論法官自由裁量權(quán)的限度.pdf
- 自由教育及其當代形態(tài).pdf
- 論啟蒙及其限度.pdf
- 論國家能力及其限度.pdf
- 論能動司法及其限度.pdf
- 公民政治表達自由正當性限度研究.pdf
- 表達自由的邊界——從互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的角度看表達自由的限度.pdf
- 網(wǎng)絡時代下政府與個人自由的限度
- 論可譯性及其限度.pdf
- 論特殊防衛(wèi)權(quán)及其限度.pdf
- 司法改革背景下法官自由裁量權(quán)的限度.pdf
評論
0/150
提交評論