版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、湘潭大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文馮友蘭境界理論研究姓名:黃艷申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專(zhuān)業(yè):中國(guó)哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:劉啟良200605085Abstract: The article want to study Feng-YuLan’s theory of state, including his theory’s congtent, practice value and shortcomings. Then the uthor expounds Tandg
2、Junyi’s sand Fand Dongmei’s theory of state. The author thinks that Feng-Yulan’s theory of state is one of the most systematic and compliment theories in modern philosophers. As it contrasts with Tang Junyi’s“Sheng Ming
3、 Jiu Jing”,Feng-YuLan’s theory of state is more philosophical than Tang’s; Tang’s theory is a comparative culture based on the theory of Buddhism’s “Panjiao”.Though Feng-YuLan’s theory of state is the most systematic it
4、is less acceptable than other Neo-Confucianists,.Many scholars study Feng-YuLan’s thoughts, but few scholar can inherit his thoughts and develop out further; on the other hand, Tang’s and Fang’s thoughts give the import
5、ant impression to academic circles, their students and followers inherit their thoughts and develop out further. The article is divided into three chapters:Chapter one expounds the theoretical base and resource of Feng-Y
6、uLan’s theory of state that integrates with his metaphysics’s system called“Xin Lixue”.“Xin Lixue”is the categorical base of Feng-Yulan’s theory of state, such as the concepts of “Yuzhou”,“Li”,“Qi”,which are expounded c
7、ompletely in “Xin Lixue”.But the difference between“Xin Lixue”and Feng-Yulan’s theory of state in more important, in a word,“Xin Lixue”cant’t testify reasonably, which is decided by Feng-Yulan’s Neo-Realism standpoint. W
8、e can say, the theoretical base and resource of Feng-Yulan’s theory of state is the traditional culture, including Confucianism, Daoism and Buddhism. Chapter two discusses the core content of Feng-YuLan’s theory of state
9、, which is called“Si Chong Jing Jie”, the state of morality and the state of religion are important, the author is centre on the two states. Feng-YuLan’s theory of state based on the category of “Juejie” ,which is good
10、at traditional self introspection and self thinking in western culture, “Juejie” has the western and eastern culture’s merits. Chapter three, we discuss the state theory of Tang Junyi’s and Fang Dongmei’s, theory of stat
11、e and his “Xin Lixue”,which is unprofitable for the modern value and vitality of Feng-YuLan’s theory of state. If we can transform if perfectly, Feng-YuLan’s theory of state will have more vitality and value, which can g
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 馮友蘭境界理論研究.pdf
- 馮友蘭境界論研究
- 馮友蘭境界論研究.pdf
- 馮友蘭人生境界說(shuō)研究.pdf
- 淺析馮友蘭人生境界說(shuō)
- 馮友蘭人生境界說(shuō)新探
- 馮友蘭的人生境界說(shuō)研究.pdf
- 淺析馮友蘭人生境界說(shuō).pdf
- 馮友蘭人生境界說(shuō)探析.pdf
- 馮友蘭人生境界說(shuō)新探.pdf
- 馮友蘭人生境界說(shuō)的倫理意蘊(yùn)研究
- 馮友蘭境界說(shuō)之“我”與“自我”.pdf
- 論馮友蘭新理學(xué)“境界”之可能.pdf
- “活東西”——馮友蘭人生境界說(shuō)新探
- 馮友蘭人生境界說(shuō)的倫理意蘊(yùn)研究.pdf
- “活東西”——馮友蘭人生境界說(shuō)新探.pdf
- 論馮友蘭的“天地境界說(shuō)”與禪宗思想
- 馮友蘭境界說(shuō)對(duì)當(dāng)代高校德育的啟示.pdf
- 馮友蘭的人生境界說(shuō)與中國(guó)夢(mèng)探究
- 馮友蘭正負(fù)方法與天地境界的實(shí)現(xiàn).pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論