版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、3600 英文單詞, 英文單詞,18500 英文字符,中文 英文字符,中文 5800 字文獻(xiàn)出處: 文獻(xiàn)出處:Tihomirovs J, Grabis J. Comparison of soap and rest based web services using software evaluation metrics[J]. Information Technology and Management Science, 2016, 19(
2、1): 92-97.Comparison of SOAP and REST Based Web Services Using Software Evaluation MetricsJuris Tihomirovs, Jānis GrabisAbstract – The usage of Web services has recently increased. Therefore, it is important to select ri
3、ght type of Web services at the project design stage. The most common implementations are based on SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) and REST (Representational State Transfer Protocol) styles. Maintainability of REST
4、and SOAP Web services has become an important issue as popularity of Web services is increasing. Choice of the right approach is not an easy decision since it is influenced by development requirements and maintenance con
5、siderations. In the present research, we present the comparison of SOAP and REST based Web services using software evaluation metrics. To achieve this aim, a systematic literature review will be made to compare REST and
6、SOAP Web services in terms of the software evaluation metrics.Keywords – Literature review, REST, SOAP, Web services.I. INTRODUCTIONA. Problem FormulationNowadays the most common way to exchange data among information sy
7、stems is to use Web services. Web services are self-contained, modular and dynamic applications by their nature [1]. Most common implementations are based on SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) and REST (Representationa
8、l State Transfer Protocol) styles. Each of these approaches has its own advantages and disadvantages, so it is important to choose the right type of Web services, otherwise it can lead to certain problems in data exchang
9、e or impose some restrictions. This paper compares SOAP and REST approaches to give recommendations on how to opt the right Web service type at a project design phase.There are a number of related studies on these protoc
10、ols, primary benefits and final value [2], [3], [4]. Other articles review real implementation examples [5], [6]. This research paper summarises these studies and gives a comparison, which helps identify the key differen
11、ces and benefits of SOAP and REST protocols.B. Aim and TasksThe aim of the paper is to summarise the main SOAP and REST protocol advantages and disadvantages.To achieve this aim, the following tasks are set:(1) to define
12、 the metrics by which it is possible to mutually compare SOAP and REST protocols;(2) to compare SOAP and REST by found metrics;(3) to evaluate which protocol type is better on the basis of software evaluation metrics.II.
13、 THEORETICAL BASISThis section addresses the key concepts that will be used in the paper.A. Web ServicesA single Web service consists of service and service description where service is a software This section describes
14、the research method that will be used for a systematic literature review.A. Data SourcesFor our research, we have included the following three electronic library sources as data sources: SCOPUS, Web of Science and IEEE X
15、plore Digital Library. We have constructed a search string using “SOAP” and “REST” as the main keywords (see Table II) and included synonyms and related terms. The search string is constructed using Boolean AND and OR op
16、erators to connect these keywords in query string (1). Search query can be represented as follows:(S1 OR S2 ... OR Sn) AND (R1 OR R2 ... OR Rn), (1)where S covers SOAP keywords and R covers REST keywords.TABLE II SEARCH
17、 KEYWORDS AND SYNONYMSSOAP RESTSimple Object Access Protocol Representational state transferSOAP Web services RESTfulSOAP Web service RESTful Web servicesRESTful Web serviceThe resulting search string is shown in (2):(SO
18、AP OR “Simple Object Access Protocol” OR “SOAP Web services” OR “SOAP Web service”)AND(REST OR “Representational state transfer” OR (2)RESTFUL OR “RESTFUL WEB SERVICES” OR “RESTFUL WEB SERVICE”)
19、 The search string has been executed in the digital library services to titles, abstracts and metadata. In order to minimise the found data sets, we have defined the criteria that the article must be in th
20、e field of computer science or IT, as well as the article must be written after 2010, as the earlier publications may contain information that is no longer up to date. Number of the found information sources is displayed
21、 in Table III.TABLE III OVERVIEW OF INFORMATION SOURCESNo. Source Format The number of information sources1 Scopus Mendelay 1902 Web of ScienceMS Excel 933 IEEE Xplore Digital LibraryMS Excel 352B. Study SelectionSince t
22、he result, which is obtained using the search query, contains 635 entries where not all the entries correspond to the theme of this study, it is necessary define the inclusion and exclusion criteria in order to limit the
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- [雙語翻譯]計(jì)算機(jī)外文翻譯--使用軟件評(píng)估計(jì)量體系比較基于soap與rest協(xié)議的web service技術(shù)(英文)
- [雙語翻譯]計(jì)算機(jī)外文翻譯--使用軟件評(píng)估計(jì)量體系比較基于soap與rest協(xié)議的web service技術(shù)中英全
- 2016年計(jì)算機(jī)外文翻譯--使用軟件評(píng)估計(jì)量體系比較基于soap與rest協(xié)議的web service技術(shù)
- 2016年計(jì)算機(jī)外文翻譯--使用軟件評(píng)估計(jì)量體系比較基于SOAP與REST協(xié)議的Web Service技術(shù).DOCX
- 2016年計(jì)算機(jī)外文翻譯--使用軟件評(píng)估計(jì)量體系比較基于SOAP與REST協(xié)議的Web Service技術(shù)(英文).PDF
- [雙語翻譯]計(jì)算機(jī)專業(yè)外文翻譯—云計(jì)算中的java web部署
- 計(jì)算機(jī)專業(yè)外文翻譯—使用java技術(shù)的頂級(jí)web設(shè)計(jì)模型的比較研究
- [雙語翻譯]計(jì)算機(jī)專業(yè)外文翻譯—云計(jì)算中的java web部署(原文)
- 計(jì)算機(jī)輔助評(píng)估【外文翻譯】
- [雙語翻譯]計(jì)算機(jī)專業(yè)外文翻譯—云計(jì)算中的java web部署中英全
- [雙語翻譯]---計(jì)算機(jī)外文翻譯--webcms一個(gè)基于web的課程管理系統(tǒng)(譯文)
- [雙語翻譯]計(jì)算機(jī)外文翻譯--開發(fā)人員視角下的java web服務(wù)性能評(píng)估
- [雙語翻譯]--計(jì)算機(jī)外文翻譯--webcms一個(gè)基于web的課程管理系統(tǒng)(英文)
- [雙語翻譯]計(jì)算機(jī)外文翻譯--基于android和wifi技術(shù)的無線訂購(gòu)系統(tǒng)
- [雙語翻譯]--計(jì)算機(jī)外文翻譯--webcms一個(gè)基于web的課程管理系統(tǒng)中英全
- 計(jì)算機(jī)科學(xué)與技術(shù)外文翻譯
- [雙語翻譯]計(jì)算機(jī)外文翻譯--開發(fā)人員視角下的java web服務(wù)性能評(píng)估(英文)
- [雙語翻譯]計(jì)算機(jī)外文翻譯--基于android和wifi技術(shù)的無線訂購(gòu)系統(tǒng)(英文)
- 計(jì)算機(jī)專業(yè)外文翻譯-web3.0
- [雙語翻譯]--計(jì)算機(jī)外文翻譯---安全型java servlet的開發(fā)
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論