公權(quán)與私權(quán)的現(xiàn)實(shí)博弈——伯林消極自由思想的當(dāng)代解讀

1、華僑大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文公權(quán)與私權(quán)的現(xiàn)實(shí)博弈——伯林消極自由思想的當(dāng)代解讀姓名：鄒平林申請學(xué)位級別：碩士專業(yè)：馬克思主義哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：楊楹20070601IIAbstract The Chinese realistic life, specially for the change of political life, causes contradiction come out between individual and the state

2、, the private rights and the public rights(power). The solution path of moral principle endowed by Chinese traditional culture is unable to address relations between public rights(power) and the private rights from the r

3、ealistic significance, the question concerning on relations between the public rights(power) and the private rights is unable to obtain the effective illustration under such linguistic climate of moral principle, it’s on

4、ly possible under climate of Legal system. Nevertheless, an important paradigm in western liberalism ideological trend, the political theory paradigm provided by Berlin’s the negative freedom thought, would be significan

5、t for us as a reference to solve this problem. Berlin keenly catches on the tension relations between the public rights(power) and the private rights in the modern society. he advocated negative freedom through some ways

6、, such as redefine freedom concept, clarify the essence of freedom and its legitimate limit, critique positive freedom and misuse or abuse of freedom, purpose of which is to delimit the legitimate limit、scope through the

7、 Abstract The Chinese realistic life, specially for the change of political life, causes contradiction come out between individual and the state, the private rights and the public rights(power). The solution path of mora

8、l principle endowed by Chinese traditional culture is unable to address relations between public rights(power) and the private rights from the realistic significance, the question concerning on relations between the publ

9、ic rights(power) and the private rights is unable to obtain the effective illustration under such linguistic climate of moral principle, it’s only possible under climate of Legal system. Nevertheless, an important paradi

10、gm in western liberalism ideological trend, the political theory paradigm provided by Berlin’s the negative freedom thought, would be significant for us as a reference to solve this problem. Berlin keenly catches on the

11、tension relations between the public rights(power) and the private rights in the modern society. he advocated negative freedom through some ways, such as redefine freedom concept, clarify the essence of freedom and its l