《論語》注疏之疑義論證.pdf

1、Y1041215學校編號!Q!竺!學號盟!≥絲；圖書分類號密級福建師范大學高等學校教師在職攻讀碩士學位論文《論語》注疏之疑義論證ArgumentationonDoubtfuIPointsifltheAnnotationonAnalects趙映環(huán)指導(dǎo)教師：筮扈一痊申請學位級別：壺笠堂撞熬垣查壁墮迭亟堂焦論文提交日期：論文評閱人：論文答辯曰期：答辯委員會主席：學位授予單位：學位授予日期：2006年10月2Q盟生!Q目22旦至邑菡熬握擔建蛭歪

2、盍翌生旦旦福建師范大學碩士學位論文AbstractAsaclassicoftheConfucianists，AnalectsisacollectionofwhatConfuciusandhisdisciplessaidanddidTherehavebeeninhistoryallimmensenumberofbooksofannotations，interpretationsandreviewsonAnalectswhoseopinio

3、nsdifferfromeachotherAstomostoftheannotations，ConfucianMastershaveprovidedsuccinctbutproperinterpretationsandanalysesHowevertherearestillsomedivergencesonwhichmeyareunabletodecidewhoarerightorwrongAsaresult，muchdifficult

4、yisproducedforbothlearnersandteachersThereis，therefore，amusttore—examineandreanalyzethemNumerousarticlesinthemodemageconstantlyemergetooffernewperspectivesonthevariousannotationsonAnalectsandsomeofthemfailtotacklewordmea

5、ningsfromtheperspectiveoftextualstudiesandconsequentlyleadtoeisegesisandconfusionAnalectsisareflectionofthegreatChinesethinkerConfucius’worldoutlook，ethics，andpoliticalandeducationalideologyFailuretomakeaccurateannotatio

6、nsforAnalectswilldefinitelyaffectanoverallunderstandingofConfucianideologyStartingfromtheprincipleoftextualstudiesandadoptingthejudgmentcriterionofwhethertheyareinviolationofsociality，modemity，andobjectivityofwordmeaning

7、s，thisthesisselectssomeofthenotesintheannotationsonAnalectswheredoubtfulpointsexistforre—examination，analysesandargumentationsinordertofindouttheirrealitiesItishopedthatitwillbeinstrumentaltothereadingandstudyofthisConfu