《洙泗考信錄》(一、二)卷之平議_21246.pdf

1、1分類號：K203學(xué)校單位代碼：10446碩士學(xué)位論文論文題目：論文題目：《洙泗考信錄》（一、二）卷之平議《洙泗考信錄》（一、二）卷之平議研究生姓名：賈徳永學(xué)科、專業(yè)：歷史文獻學(xué)研究方向：儒家文獻整理與研究導(dǎo)師姓名、職稱：黃懷信教授論文完成時間：2012年4月3AbstractConfuciusasagreatthinkerinChinesehistyChineseculturecanbedescribedasfarreaching.I

2、tsRoadrecycledtwothousyearstheauthenticityofmiscellaneousout.ItcanbesaidthatafterhimtheimageofConfuciushasbeenthegradualalienationevendeified.ThusresearchConfuciuslifestyistofurtherstudythebasisofConfucianthoughtearlyCon

3、fucianismCuiShuItiswiththewldundersttherealConfuciuspurposeofwriting“ZhuSiKaoXinLu”.ThisBookwillbeaboutConfuciusrecdsarrangedchronologicallywherethepassnotebeparameterpermitsarenottoTextualrecdreceivedalotofstudyofConfuc

4、iuslifestyideasofimptantreferencematerialshighvaluebutThebookalsohasitslimitations.“ZhuSiKaoXinLu”weshouldpayattentiontodrawtherightconclusioncannotignetheerrtherefethisarticleattemptstorealattitudemakeasystematiccombing

5、indertofairobjective.InthispaperononeofVolumesIIIstudiesfeachchapterthefirstcolumnCuiShucited“ZhuSiKaoXinLu”intheDynastyofancientbooksthenlistsCuiShuDynastyofcontent.FinallytheauthCuiviewsofjudgmentinthefmofthenoteDiscri

6、mination.AddedthetitleofeachchapteriginallyMr.GuJiegangfinishingCuiDongBiYiShumeaccuratelysummeduptheCuiShuperaresearchtherefeuseddirectlyasthesubtitleofthearticle.“ZhuSiKaoXinLu”wasrecdedasaTextualthewritingsofConfucius

7、lifestynodoubtitisgroundbreaking.BooktogetridofthecultofConfuciusthefirsttimetoobserveasecularperspectiveConfuciusthisisthehighlightofCuiShu“ZhuSiKaoXinLu”.itscontentsisquitedetailedundertheguidanceoftheprincipleof“testl

8、etterintheSixArts“CuiShuintheuseofavarietyofDistinguishingmethodthelifeofConfuciusofcourseincludinghisAnceststodoadetailedTextualTranscendprovidesmanyusefulcluesfustostudyConfuciusZhuSitestletterrecdedofConfuciusessentia

9、linfmation.“ZhuSiKaoXinLu”havemanyproblems.Firsthemakessensetoconsidertheletterofancienthistythecompositionofthesubjectivelogicalreasoningmeoftentotreasuretothisancient.SecondtheDynastyissometimesconclusionsarecrectbutth

10、elackofargumentcitedintheargumentitselfiswrongwhichresultedintheconfusionofhisDynastythisphenomenonsupplementitsargumentstocrectitserrargument.ThirdCuiShublindlybelieveintheurestocompletelydenytheBookofthephilosopherswhi