布依族學(xué)生英語送氣音習(xí)得的跨語言影響研究.pdf

1、分類號(hào)：H0密級(jí)：無學(xué)校代碼：10414學(xué)號(hào)：2012010415碩士研究生學(xué)位論文碩士研究生學(xué)位論文CrosslinguisticInfluenceonBouyeiSeniHighSchoolStudents’EnglishAspirationAcquisition布依族學(xué)生英語送氣音習(xí)得的跨語言影布依族學(xué)生英語送氣音習(xí)得的跨語言影響研究響研究熊凱娟熊凱娟院所：外國語學(xué)院導(dǎo)師姓名：晏小琴學(xué)位類別：學(xué)術(shù)型碩士專業(yè)領(lǐng)域：二語習(xí)得二○一六年

2、四月IAbstractInrecentyearsastheresearchesonthirdlanguageacquisition(L3)amountedthirdlanguageacquisitionresearchhasexperiencedimptantdevelopmentbegantoberegardedasaseparateresearchfield.Thisstudyconductedanempiricalstudyont

3、hecrosslinguisticinfluenceintheacquisitionofEnglishaspirationsofBouyeiSenihighEnglishstudentsaimsatgettingaclearideaaboutthecommonproblemsinBouyeistudents’aspirationacquisitionexplingtherelationshipbetweenthethreelanguag

4、esknowntoBouyeistudents.AfterthatthepotentialfactsthatmayinfluencethecrosslinguisticinfluenceinTLAareexpectedtobedugout.Totally84subjectsfrom2firstyearsenihighclassesinWangmoMinitydleSchoolwereinvolvedinthepresentstudyth

5、eyaredividedintotwogroupsaccdingtotheirethnicgroups.MeoverlanguagebackgroundquestionnairesphonemediscriminationtestsonEnglishaspirationsEnglishaspirationtestsfollowupinterviewswereadoptedtocollectdatafromthesubjects.With

6、bothquantitativequalitativemethodsthisresearchattemptstoanswerthefollowingquestions:(l)WhichlanguagehasagreaterinfluenceonBouyeistudents’learningofEnglishaspirationsBouyeiChinese(2)ArethereanydifferencesbetweenBouyeistud

7、entsChinesestudentsintheproficiencylevelofEnglishaspirations(3)WhatpotentialcrosslinguisticfactshaveaffectedBouyeistudents’acquisitionofEnglishaspirationsfromLItoL3Themajfindingsare:(1)TheBouyeistudents’L1(Bouyeilanguage

8、)hasagreaterinfluenceontheirlearningofEnglishaspirations(2)BouyeistudentsshowedlessproficiencyintheacquisitionofEnglishaspirationswhencomparedwithChinesestudents(3)Languagedistancelanguageproficiencyrecencyoflanguageusea

9、rethepotentialfactsthatmayhaveconstraintsonthecrosslinguisticinfluenceinBouyeistudents’acquisitionofEnglishaspirations.Thesefindingsareofboththeeticalpracticalsignificance:theeticallytheymayenablethelinguistsresearchersg