俄漢語(yǔ)評(píng)價(jià)句對(duì)比研究.pdf

1、哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文俄漢語(yǔ)評(píng)價(jià)句對(duì)比研究姓名：郁文靜申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：外國(guó)語(yǔ)言學(xué)及應(yīng)用語(yǔ)言學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：劉穎20050601哈爾濱T業(yè)大學(xué)文學(xué)碩4l：學(xué)位論文AbstractEvaluativeisamentalprocessbasedOnpsychologicalactivity；itsdirectinvolvementinlanguagecommunicationformstheevaluativescopeinlingu

2、istics，Theprocessofevaluativenotonlyreflectsthesubjectivejudgmentupontheobjectbutalsoexposesthesubject’SemotionalaltitudetowardstheobjectbeingevaluatedRussianLinguistshaveinvestigatedtheevaluativesignificancecomprehensiv

3、elyandsystemicallyatsyntacticallevel，semanticlevelandpragmaticlevel，ConsequentlyarichsetofpapersandbooksonthesubjecthasbeenpublishedHowever，uDtonOWtheresearchesdevotedtoChineseevaluativesignificanceingeneralandtheresearc

4、hestoitssyntaxinparticularhavehardlybeenstartedBasedonthetheoriesofRussianstudiesintheevaluativescopeandconcentratingonpredicate，thisarticlemakesitsbesteffortstodemonstratethedifferencesandsimilaritiesofevaluativesignifi

5、cancebetweenRussianandChineselanguagesbothsemanticallyandstructurallybydescribing，analyzing，comparingtheconcretegrammaticalstructuresofevaluativesignificanceinRussianandChinese，Thisarticleconsistsoffivesections：Thefirsts

6、ectionpresentsasurveyonthecurrentresearchesonthesubjectworldwideandtheobjectivesofthisarticle；Thesecondsectiondescribestheevaluationsentencesandstatisticallyanalyzestheusageoftheevaluationsentences；Thethirdsectioncompreh

7、ensivelydescribes，analyzes，andcomparestheexpressivenessoftheevaluationsentencesinRussianandChinese；italsodemonstratesthedifierencesandsimilaritiesofevaluationsentenceswithpredicatesbetweenthetwolanguagesTheforthsectionfo