專(zhuān)利侵權(quán)行為判定規(guī)則研究.pdf

1、復(fù)旦大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文專(zhuān)利侵權(quán)行為判定規(guī)則研究姓名：周建梅申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專(zhuān)業(yè)：法律指導(dǎo)教師：孫曉屏20040326AbstractPatenthasbeenborntoimpeltheadvancementoftechnologybyvirtueofprofitreturning，itclearlydefinetherightbetweenpatenteeandthepublic。Asatwo—edgedsword，itprotect

2、sthetechnologyproductcreatedwhiledeniesthefreeusingoftheseresearchproductsbythepublicInordertomakefulluseofthepatent，wemustestablishsomedefiniteandexercisablerulestocognizethepatentinfringement，whichcangiveacomparativelY

3、clearguidetothepublicwhentheyarereadytousethescienceandtechnologyopening，bytellingwhatispermittedornotThepatentlawcameintobeingfaraftersuchasCivilLaw。CriminalLawandetcWiththeadvancementofsaienceandtechnology，themeansofin

4、fringementbecomesdiversificationandthecaseofinfringementhasgoinguptrendTherefore，itisveryimportanttoestablishunitiveandveraciouscognizingrulespatentinfringementThetheoryoftortinCivilLawisthebasisforstudyingthepatentinfri

5、ngementThespecialfeaturesofpatentrightbringsomenewquestionsofthebasistheoryAimingatthefeatures，thedefinitionoftheinfringementact，theprinciplesfordeterminingtheliabilityoftheinfringementandindispensablefactorsofinfringeme

6、ntoftraditionalcivillawneedtobeadjustedaccordinglyThisessay，onbasisoftheanalysisofthecognizingrulesaboutpatentinfringement，inviewofthesituationofdisunityforcognizingrulesofpatentinfringementinourcountry，pointoutsomeconst

7、ructivelegislativeproposalssothatcanenrichourpatentsystemoncognizingtheinfringementactionConsideringthedifferenceontherightprotectionbetweeninventionandindustrydesign，thepatentreferrednotincludingtheindustrydesignKeyword