版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、安徽大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文論公民刑事訴訟權(quán)姓名:華楓申請學(xué)位級別:碩士專業(yè):訴訟法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:王圣揚2003.4.1ABSTRACTWiththeriseoftheideologicaltrendofhumanrightsintheworld,theconscioushessofselfprotectionandrelievingofcitizen‘SindividualrightsarestrengthenedgreatlyInthecri
2、meprocedure,thekeyrightthatcarlrealizeselfprotectionandrelievingofcitizen’Sindividualrights_—thecitizens’righttocriminalsuithasbecomethefocustowhichthedevelopedcountiesgovernedbylawpaycloseattentionwithgreatresearcheffor
3、tsAccordingtothelegalpracticeofthedevelopedcountrygovernedbylawinthe20thcenturythecitizens’fighttocriminalsuithasmovedtowardsconstitutionalizedandinternationalizedtrend,andbecomeabasicstartingpointandthefinalgoalaswell,w
4、henmanycountriesdesignandreformjudicialsystemIndeed,itsestablishmentanddevelopmenthasadvancedjudicialdemocratizationofdevelopedcountrygovemedbylawTheperspective,fromrightbutnotpowertoresearchcriminalprocedureandbuildjudi
5、cialsystemandprocedure,willdeepenpeople’Sunderstandingofcriminalprocedure’Sorigin,essenceandregulation,whichisbeneficialtealizethemoderncriminalprocedure’Sgoalofpunishingcrimesandensuringhumanrightswithequalimportance,an
6、dbeneficialtoperfectnationaljudicialpower’SoperationrationallyandsetupscientificrestrictivemechanismofpowertooObviouslythetheoryandcorrespondingoperationpracticeofsuchagenerallyappliedfight,willbringinspirationtotoday‘Sj
7、udicialreforminChina,tooThisdissertationfocusesonthediscussionofthisrightinseveralaspects:PartOne:In仃oduction,proposesthecitizens’righttocriminalsuitwhilecomparingthejudicalideaofourcountrywiththatofthewesterncountryPart
8、Two:Thesurveyofthecitizens’righttocriminalsuit,Startingfromitsconcept,thispartmakesaconcreteanalysisOfintention,subjectofrightandexternalformofexpressionofthisright,comparesitwithproceduralright,andslressesitaskeyrightto
9、protectcitizenentityrightsandinterestsatthepubliclawPartThree:Thehistoricalgradualprogressofthecitizen’scriminalsuitfightThecitizens’righttocriminalsuitexperiencedadevelopingprocessfromuncivilizationandspontaneitytodepri
10、vationandreslxaint,uptothestatethatthisfightisestablishedbytheconstitutionfinallyandfullyensured,PartFour:thejurisprudenceanalysisofestablishmentanddevelopmentofthecitizens’righttocrimialsuitThisparthasexpoundedthetheore
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 論刑事訴訟中辯護律師訴訟權(quán)利及保障.pdf
- 刑事訴訟權(quán)利憲法化問題研究.pdf
- 論刑事訴訟管轄權(quán)異議制度.pdf
- 論刑事訴訟效率.pdf
- 論刑事訴訟中的證人特免權(quán).pdf
- 論當(dāng)前未成年人刑事訴訟權(quán)益的保護.pdf
- 憲政視野下的刑事訴訟權(quán)利——權(quán)力配置.pdf
- 刑事訴訟律師會見權(quán)研究.pdf
- 論刑事訴訟中隱私權(quán)的保護.pdf
- 論刑事訴訟憲法化.pdf
- 論刑事訴訟告知程序.pdf
- 論刑事訴訟證明方法.pdf
- 論刑事訴訟比例原則.pdf
- 論刑事訴訟中的公正審判權(quán).pdf
- 刑事訴訟目的論.pdf
- 論刑事訴訟利益平衡.pdf
- 論刑事訴訟的功能.pdf
- 淺談被害人的刑事訴訟權(quán)利及保護
- 論刑事訴訟中配偶的拒絕作證權(quán).pdf
- 論對我國未成年人刑事訴訟權(quán)利的保護.pdf
評論
0/150
提交評論