論操縱市場(chǎng)行為.pdf

1、湖南師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文論操縱市場(chǎng)行為姓名：傅卞強(qiáng)申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：法學(xué)理論指導(dǎo)教師：王濤20030401AbstractThisdissertationfollowsthreechaptersInChapter1itpointsoutthatthemanipulationofsecuritiesmarketiSintrinsicallyasortoffraudulenttorts，byanalyzingthelegalnatur

2、eofthemanipulationinlightofsuchbasictheoriesasjurisprudence，civillawandcommerciallawInChapter2itfirstlycastsaintrospectivethinkingonthetheoryoftraditionaltortsinwhichrequisitesofactandonesofliabilityarefrequentlymingledt

3、ogether，thenprobesintotheconcreteessentialsoftherequisiteswhichconstitutesthesecuritiesmanipulationInthepartwhichresearchesthemanipulativemeans，comparingwiththerelevantregulationsinUSA，Japan，HongkongandTaiwanthisthesisen

4、kindlessomeenlightenmentandproposesmanyadvicesfortheamendingoftheChinaSecuritiesLawConsideringthemanipulativepurpose，itsupposesapplyingindirectlyconstructivetheoryuponthesubject，andalsostatesthedisadvantageofsuchanapplic

5、ationThereisstillacontrastamongstChina，USAandJapanThethirdChaptermainlyfocusesonthecivilindemnityliabilityoriginatingfromthesecuritiesmanipulationTobeginwith，thefirstpartascertainsthatsuchkindoftortsgenerallytrepassesont

6、heobjectofSOcalled“pureeconomicinterest’Innextpart，itdemonstratesindetailtherequisiteswithwhichwouldincuracivildamageliabilityRegardingthefault(includingbothintentionandnegligence)，itputforwardaviewpointthatweshouldimpos

7、ethecivilliabilityuponmanipulationsofChinesesecuritiesmarketonthebasisofconstructivefaultprincipleAboutthequestionofiniuria(wrong)，theauthorstudiestwoaspects，oneisassumptionofrisk，theotheristhemodelofdetermininginiuriaan

8、dsolutionsproposedThelatterisatheoreticalinnovation，itcriticizesthegivenmodelinChinesesecuritiesmarketinwhichonlygettheCSRC’SaffirmationofiniuriafirstlycarlyouclaimfordamagesThengotothecausation，withseveralEuropeancountr