中日專利訴訟模式比較研究.pdf

1、華中科技大學碩士學位論文中日專利訴訟模式比較研究姓名：趙振申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：經(jīng)濟法學指導教師：余翔20080422華中科技大學碩士學位論文華中科技大學碩士學位論文IIAbstractThecomingofintelligenceeconomyerapushesprotectionoftheintellectualpropertytothefefrontofthesociety.Whencometotheintellectualpr

2、opertyprotectioninourcountrytherearesomeproblemsexistingbothinlegislationtheprotectionsystem.Theproblemshavehadinfluencesconstraintontheimprovementofprotectionleveltheimplementofprotectionfunction.Thestudyofthispaperisto

3、chooseonepointofthejudicialprotectionsystemofintellectualpropertyrightsthenfocusonthecomparisonbetweenChineselitigationmodesJapaneselitigationmode.Thispaperfirstwillgiveacleardefinitionofpatentlitigationmodewhichmakesthe

4、keypointofthestudyclear.ThenthepaperwillgivethecomparisonbetweenChineselitigationmodesJapaneselitigationmodebylawcomparingcaseanalyzingtogether.ThispaperwillintroducethedevelopmentofJapanesepatentlitigationatfirstanalyze

5、relatedlegislationcasestoconcludethemodefeatureofJapanesepatentlitigation.AfterthatthispaperwillintroduceanalyzerelatedsituationinChina.Thenitwillgivethecomparisonofthepatentlitigationintwocountriesbycomparingtheirrelate

6、dlawlitigationjurisdiction.Throughcomparisonanalysistheconsistencedifferencesbetweenthetwocountriesintheirexistingjudicialpracticereviewpracticewillbeconcludedaswellastheiradvantagesdisadvantages.Atlastagainsttherealityo

7、fourcountrycombingwiththegoodresultofthethirdamendmenton“PatentLaw”startedbyChineseIntellectualPropertyBureauthispaperwillgivesomerefmationadviceonthreeproblems.Theyarejudgeganizationsystemofintellectualpropertyrequestpr

8、ocedureofinvaliddeclarationofpatentthefollowingjudicialreviewprocedureinChinathecountergeofinvalidpatentsuspendlitigationinpatentinvasionlawsuits.Thispaperhopestofindalitigationmodeofintellectualpropertyrightsthatsuitsth

9、esituationofcountry.byitwecouldimprovethequalityefficiencyofintellectualpropertylitigationtrialthengiveagreatpushtothedevelopmentofintellectualpropertystrategyinourcountry.KeyWds:PatentlitigationLitigationjurisdictionLit