代物清償?shù)睦碚撆c實踐問題研究.pdf

1、黑龍江大學碩士學位論文代物清償?shù)睦碚撆c實踐問題研究姓名：鄭玉祥申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：法律民商法學指導教師：孫毅20081113黑龍江大學碩士學位論文AbstractThelegaldeviceofacceptanceinthefulfillmentoflieureferstothesituationthatthecreditoracceptsotherwaysoffulfillmentinsteadoftheoriginallyagr

2、eedone，SOthattheobligationCallbewindupItwillhelpthecreditorrealizehis／herrightsandinterestinthecircumstancethattheagreedperformancerenderedimpossible，itwillfacilitatethepartiestochooseamorereasonablesubjectmatteraccordin

3、gtothesituationitwillalsohavetheobligationperformedassoonaspossibleanddiversifythecontentoftheobligationAsawayofwindinguptheobligationthislegaldeviceisprescribedinlawsofmanycountries，however，thereisnosuchkindofprescripti

4、oninChineselaw；itiswidelyrecognizedinthepracticeandamongscholarsinaccordance、析tlltheprincipleofcontractfreedomThelegaldeviceofacceptanceinthefulfillmentoflieuisasubstituteofperformance，itsconceptcomesoutoftheperformance，

5、thoughthereishugedifferencebetweenthem，themostdistinctivefeatureisthatitisakindofcontractAsacontract，itsnatureismuchdebated，somepeopleinsistthatitisthekindofcontractexecutedbytransferringthesubjectmatterwhileothersbeliev

6、eitisarefreshmentofthecontract，someothersconsideritasaspecialwayofmodifyingthecontractBesides，inthefieldofchangingthesubjectmatteroftheobligationthereexistothertwolegaldevicesbesidesthediscussedone，namelytheindirectperfo

7、rmanceandtherefreshmentoftheobligationtheydifferslightlyandoverlap、析t11eachotherinthepracticeThispaperwillanalyzetheconstitutiveelementsfromtheaboveaspectsanddiscussthedebatedproblemsofthelegaldeviceofacceptanceinthefulf