檢察機關(guān)提起附帶民事訴訟研究.pdf

1、南京師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文檢察機關(guān)提起附帶民事訴訟研究姓名：陳冬青申請學(xué)位級別：碩士專業(yè)：法律碩士指導(dǎo)教師：陳愛武20100517AbstractACcordillgtotheprovisionsofchina’scriminalprocedurelaw，iftheStatepropen)，，C0ll刪veprop嘶lossesduetothedefendant’scriminalbehavior，theP∞plesPr0Curatora

2、tecaIl6lethesupplementarycivilactionwhileprosecutorintheprosecutlonSuchactionwhichisessentiallycivillitigationwithaprivatenature，buttheProsecutors1smemambodyofsuchlawsuits，andsolvingtheproblemofpublicinterestclaims，SOita

3、lsohasapublicnatLlreBecausethespecialproperties，manydoctrinaldisputesanse：prosecutorsshouldbegrantedcivilprocedurerights；thiskindoflawsuitisinbreachofthepnncipleofselfdisposition；thiskindoflawsuitisinbreachoftheprinciple

4、ofequality；mepmsecutortspositioninthelawsuitisconfusingInjudicialpractice，veryfewc船es時“sl(indoflawsuitwerefiledbyprosecutors，SOstateownedandcollectivepropenlesarenotwellprotectedThisarticleattemptstojustifythatthePeople’

5、sProcuratorate1squalifiedtofilethiskindoflawsuitandhastheinterestsofthesuppleIllent叫aⅥllitig螄on；thereforethePeople’sProcuratorateshouldbegrantedcivilproceduralnghtsProsecutorsarede矗：ndersofpublicinterests，whentherelevant

6、organsfailedtoexerclsetheird塒es，“tiatingthelawsuitisstateintervention，thisdoesnotviolatetheprincipleofselfdispositionProsecutorsinthisclassalenotprivilegedinlitigation，legalsup洲1slonofprosecutorsaleonlyapostsupervision，t

7、hePeople’sCourtsindealingwimthis帥eotactioncanmaintain如11neutralityrealtermsofinequalitydidnotexistinthepattiesOnthisbasisIfurtheranalyzetheProcuratoratelawsuitsituationinjudiclalpractlceAccordingtotheprobl鋤ofthejudicialp

8、ractice，thepaperpresentsanumberofme刪es，thelawsuitcasesmgealefurtherclarified，themajorenvironmentalpollutlonc嬲es，monopoliesandothercasesfiledlawsuitagainstsocialistmarketeconomyorderareaddedandtheprosetutorspositioninthel