版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、1中文 中文 2060 字, 字,1200 單詞, 單詞,6600 英文字符 英文字符出處: 出處:Source:John M. Trussel and Laura C. Rose. Fair Value Accounting and the Current Financial Crisis[J]. CPA Journal, 2009,79(6):26-30原文: 原文:Fair Value Accounting and the C
2、urrent Financial CrisisJonh M.Trussel and Laura C.RoseThe accounting for financial assets and liabilities is a complex issue that has been evolving toward the use of fair value. Both the FASB and IASB provide the option
3、of using fair value accounting in reporting financial assets and liabilities and certain other items. This move is not without controversy. Many have opined that the use of fair value accounting, as opposed to historical
4、 cost accounting, has helped cause the turmoil the financial markets. Research indicates that the exclusive use of one accounting method may not be efficient for financial institutions. The authors believe that the FASB
5、should consider an alternative accounting approach that would incorporate both systems and mitigate the inefficiencies of using just one accounting method.In seeking to explain the current financial crisis, the spotlight
6、 has turned to fair value accounting and financial institutions. FASB issued SFAS 157. Fair Value Measurements, in September 2006. Shortly thereafter, the problems related to the sub prime mortgage market began to surfac
7、e. Many began to question whether or not the current distress in financial institutions is related to the new accounting standard. Did the new standard exacerbate the problems or merely illuminate them?In October 2008. T
8、hen President George W. Bush signed into law the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA), the so-called bailout bill. Under section 132 of the EESA. Congress gave the SEC the authority to suspend the use of f
9、air value accounting under SFAS 157. Section 133 requires the SEC to conduct a study of the fair value accounting as stipulated in SFAS 157. See Exhibit 1 for excerpts from these two sections of the EESA. Note that in Se
10、ction 133, Congress even calls on the SEC to “review the process used by the Financial Accounting Standards Board in developing accounting standards.“ This is a much broader 3a three-tier system of classifying assets. Le
11、vel one asset has an active market with observable market prices. These assets include publicly traded securities that have a quoted price and that are actively traded on a national securities exchange. Level two assets
12、do not have directly observable market prices. They are marked-to-market using inputs from observable market prices of similar assets. These may be prices of similar securities, interest rates, commercial real estate, an
13、d the like. Level three assets do not have observable market prices for the asset or similar assets, or the market may be illiquid. In this latter category, companies have to use more subjective estimates of fair value.
14、According to SFAS 157, level three consists of unobservable inputs, such as those that reflect the reporting entity's own assumptions about what market participants would use to price the asset (including risk), deve
15、loped using the best information available under a cost-benefit analysis. There is no requirement to verify whether the assumptions are in line with those of market participants. These thinly traded assets and liabilitie
16、s are measured using estimates based on the value the company believes a hypothetical third party would pay for them. The question becomes how to value illiquid, unique, or complex assets. Should companies apply their ow
17、n models? Some investors worry that this option gives company management too much discretion. The complexity of such assets suggests that it may not be possible to find a widely acceptable method.A related standard, SFAS
18、 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities., was issued in February 2007 and became effective for most companies on November 15. 2007. This standard gives companies the option of accountin
19、g for certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The optional adoption covers interest rate swaps, bonds, stocks, warranty obligations, and the like. This election can be made on an instrument-by- instrument
20、 basis, with the resulting unrealized gains and losses reported in earnings. The IASB also has a .standard that allows the use of fair value accounting for financial assets and liabilities (IAS 39, Financial Instruments:
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 將金融危機歸咎于公允價值會計公平嗎?【外文翻譯】
- 將金融危機歸咎于公允價值會計是否公平?【外文翻譯】
- 金融危機下的公允價值會計改進對策
- 面對金融危機探討公允價值
- 此次金融危機歸咎于公允價值是否公平?【外文翻譯】
- 金融危機下中國公允價值會計的反思
- 后金融危機時代的公允價值會計.pdf
- 金融危機背景下的公允價值會計問題研究
- 后金融危機時代公允價值會計問題研究.pdf
- 出現(xiàn)金融危機去怪罪公允價值的計量公平嗎?【外文翻譯】
- 基于2008金融危機的公允價值研究.pdf
- 外文翻譯--公允價值會計、金融和會計可靠性的關(guān)系(節(jié)選)
- 外文翻譯--公允價值會計和經(jīng)濟危機信號還是誘因?
- 當前金融危機和經(jīng)濟危機背景下
- 后金融危機時代公允價值應用問題研究
- 金融危機背景下公允價值計量問題研究.pdf
- 公允價值會計【外文翻譯】
- 公允價值會計,金融經(jīng)濟和可靠性重塑【外文翻譯】
- 外文翻譯--完全公允價值會計時代的到來 (節(jié)選)
- 金融危機背景下公允價值的應用研究.pdf
評論
0/150
提交評論