版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、Did securitization affect the cost of corporate debt?$Taylor D. Nadauld a,n, Michael S. Weisbach ba Department of Finance, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA b Ohio State University and NBER, USAa r t i c l e i n
2、 f oArticle history:Received 23 February 2011Received in revised form6 July 2011Accepted 4 August 2011JEL classification:G21G31Keywords:SecuritizationCollateralized loan obligations (CLO)Corporate bank loansa b s t r a c
3、 tThis paper investigates whether the securitization of corporate bank loan facilities hadan impact on the price of corporate debt. Our results suggest that loan facilities that aresubsequently securitized are associated
4、 with a 17 basis point lower spread than that offacilities that are not subsequently securitized. We consider facility characteristics thatare associated with the likelihood of securitization and estimate the extent to w
5、hichthese characteristics are related to spreads. We document that Term Loan B facilities,facilities of B-rated firms, and facilities originated by banks that originate CLOs aresecuritized more frequently than other faci
6、lities. Spreads on facilities estimated to bemore likely to be subsequently securitized have lower spreads than otherwise similarfacilities. The results are consistent with the view that securitization caused a reduction
7、in the cost of capital.Sufi, 2007; Ivashina, 2009).2. Institutional backgroundCollateralized loan obligations (CLOs) transform spec- ulative-grade bank loan facilities into highly rated bonds through the process of pooli
8、ng and tranching.6 The incidence of securitizing corporate bank loans exploded between 2002 and 2007 and has been well-documented in the literature and popular press. Over 80% of the CLOs originated between 1996 and 2008
9、 were originated in the years 2002–2007, with nearly 50% occurring in 2006 and the first half of 2007 alone.7 Also noteworthy is the fact that between 2002 and 2007, 79% of new CLOs were originated by just ten banks. In
10、short, the creation of CLOs was very active over a relatively short period of time and concentrated in a relatively small number of originating banks. Theoretically, securitization can occur for a number of reasons. Firs
11、t, DeMarzo (2005) suggests that securitiza- tion reduces asymmetric information problems about the quality of individual loans by providing the purchaser with a diversified pool of loans from different issuers, presumabl
12、y having a lower information asymmetry pro- blem than any individual loan would have. Second, Gaur, Seshadri, and Subrahmanyam (2011) point out that securitization reduces market incompleteness, providing investors who v
13、alue that particular cash-flow distribution with the ability to purchase it. Finally, Coval, Jurek, and Stafford (2009), relying on the assumption that investors purchase bonds based solely on credit ratings, attribute t
14、he proliferation of securitization activity between 2002– 2007 to the potential for deal arrangers to deliver the cheapest possible set of assets that can obtain a high quality credit rating, thereby engaging in ratings
15、arbit- rage. The observation that the bank loans of B-rated borrowers were securitized more frequently than Ba- rated loans is consistent with a ‘‘cheapest-to-deliver’’ view of collateral selection in securitization. Yet
16、, none of these theories of securitization provides a rationale for why securitization should affect the spreads on loan facilities that subsequently are securitized. In other words, given two loan facilities, why should
17、 their spreads differ depending on whether they are subse- quently securitized if the risks associated with the loans’ repayment are identical? For this to be the case, the very process of securitization likely influence
18、s the lender’s decision about the loan at the time of origination.6 The term ‘‘tranche’’ is used to describe different bonds arising froma CLO deal and is also used to describe different loan facilities within abank loan
19、. The term tranche in this sentence refers to the tranches(bonds) that arise from the origination of a CLO. 7 Data on CLO originations are presented in Table 2.Please cite this article as: Nadauld, T.D., Weisbach, M.S.,
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- [雙語翻譯]外文翻譯--證券化會(huì)影響公司債務(wù)的成本嗎?(節(jié)選)
- [雙語翻譯]外文翻譯--證券化會(huì)影響公司債務(wù)的成本嗎?中英全
- 2012年外文翻譯--證券化會(huì)影響公司債務(wù)的成本嗎?
- 2012年外文翻譯--證券化會(huì)影響公司債務(wù)的成本嗎?(英文).PDF
- 2012年外文翻譯--證券化會(huì)影響公司債務(wù)的成本嗎?(節(jié)選).DOCX
- [雙語翻譯]債務(wù)融資外文翻譯--投資者熟悉度和公司債務(wù)融資條件(英文)
- [雙語翻譯]債務(wù)融資外文翻譯--投資者熟悉度和公司債務(wù)融資條件
- [雙語翻譯]債務(wù)融資外文翻譯--投資者熟悉度和公司債務(wù)融資條件中英全
- [雙語翻譯]銀行盈利能力外文翻譯--理清證券化對(duì)銀行盈利能力的影響(英文)
- 2017年債務(wù)融資外文翻譯--投資者熟悉度和公司債務(wù)融資條件(英文).PDF
- 資產(chǎn)證券化【外文翻譯】
- 2017年債務(wù)融資外文翻譯--投資者熟悉度和公司債務(wù)融資條件
- [雙語翻譯]銀行盈利能力外文翻譯--理清證券化對(duì)銀行盈利能力的影響(節(jié)選)
- [雙語翻譯]外文翻譯--影響公司盈利能力的因素(英文)
- 2017年債務(wù)融資外文翻譯--投資者熟悉度和公司債務(wù)融資條件.DOCX
- 保險(xiǎn)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)證券化【外文翻譯】
- 我國上市公司債務(wù)融資成本研究.pdf
- 亞洲的資產(chǎn)證券化【外文翻譯】
- 公司債務(wù)融資研究.pdf
- 公司債務(wù)治理效應(yīng)綜述
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論