我國有限責(zé)任公司股東除名制度的完善

1、分類號： D923.99 密級：UDC： 346 學(xué)校代碼：11065碩 士 專 業(yè) 學(xué) 位 論 文我國有限責(zé)任公司股東除名制度的完善 我國有限責(zé)任公司股東除名制度的完善徐方倩 徐方倩指 導(dǎo) 教 師 袁有信 副教授學(xué) 位 類 別 法律碩士專 業(yè) 領(lǐng) 域 商法經(jīng)濟(jì)法答 辯 日 期 2017 年 5 月 26 日IIAbstracthe company in foreign business development, between the

2、 shareholders inevitablybecause of different decisions on matters arising from differences in the management ofthe affairs of the company, shareholders or by individual behavior so that companies introuble or damage the

3、interests of the company. The expulsion system is through legalprocedures in addition to a solution of the separation of shareholder qualification heart toleave the company to solve the company's internal contradicti

4、ons, help the company outof trouble, enabled the company to resume normal operation. Explain our country seventeenth for the first time the provisions of the rules to lift thequalification of shareholders in particular

5、circumstances, but the interpretation of theshareholders removed from the substantive and procedural elements of the design arerelatively simple, resulting in the company the passive position in the application of theexp

6、ulsion system, but also makes the lack of specific evidence in the trial court in the caseof expulsion caused by different co contracting phenomenon.Therefore, this thesis from a classic case The necessity to establish t

7、he expulsionsystem, then briefly expounds on the concept, then the relevant provisions of China'scurrent established by the expulsion of shareholders is analyzed and summarized throughthe case to clarify the expulsio

8、n system arising in the practical application of the dispute,then state of the region is mainly in Germany and the United States legislation andjudicial by comparing the practice, finally focuses on the causes of expulsi