版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、Out-of-plane flexural behavior of unreinforced red brick walls strengthened with FRP compositesAyman S. MosallamCivil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of California, Irvine, CA 92604, USAReceived 20 M
2、arch 2006; accepted 27 July 2006 Available online 27 December 2006AbstractThis paper presents the results of a study focused on evaluating the out-of-plane flexural behavior of two fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composit
3、e systems for strengthening unreinforced red brick masonry walls. The full-scale tests followed the International Code Council Evaluation Service (ICC-ES) AC 125 procedure. In the experimental program, a total of four fu
4、ll-scale destructive tests were conducted on UMR red brick walls. One wall specimen was used as control (as-built) specimen without composites, and the remaining three wall specimens were strengthened with either E-glass
5、/epoxy or carbon/epoxy composite systems with different fiber architecture. The effect of applying a cross-ply laminate on the ultimate failure mode has been investigated. Full-scale experimental results confirmed the ef
6、fectiveness of the FRP composite strengthening systems in upgrading the out-of-plane flexural structural performance of URM walls. In addition, an analytical model was developed to predict the ultimate load capacity of t
7、he retrofitted walls. The analytical mod- eling is based on deformation compatibility and force equilibrium using simple section analysis procedure. A good agreement between the experimental and theoretical results was o
8、btained. ? 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Keywords: A. Laminates; B. Delamination; D. Mechanical testing; E. Lay-up (manual); Infrastructure1. IntroductionIn general, unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings per- for
9、m poorly in earthquakes. Two types of failure are com- monly encountered in URM buildings subjected to seismic forces. The first failure mode occurred in in-plane shear that are designed to form the lateral load resistin
10、g system of the building. The other type of failure is due to out-of- plane bending stresses caused by seismic inertial forces. The excessive out-of-plane bending is also a major reason for the loss of load carrying capa
11、city of URM walls. Fig. 1 shows a typical failure of unreinforced red brick wall due to excessive out-of-plane seismic forces. Composites offer an attractive strengthening protocol for existing and historical unreinforce
12、d masonry structures.In the past few decades, composites have successfully been used in different construction applications including strengthening of reinforced concrete, steel and timber structures. An in-depth review
13、of different applications of composites in repair and rehabilitation is discussed by Mosallam [1]. Lately, several studies have been conducted on evaluating the use of polymeric composites for repair and strengthening bo
14、th unreinforced and reinforced masonry walls subjected to seismic, wind and lateral earth pressure. The advantages of using composite materials in this application are (i) ease of application, (ii) preservation of the ge
15、ometrical and architectural details of the walls, (iii) their high strength-to-weight ratio, and (iv) their high resis- tance to corrosion as compared to metallic strengthening systems. This paper presents a summary of e
16、xperimental and theoretical results of a study that was conducted to characterize the out-of-plane flexural behavior of unrein- forced masonry walls externally strengthened with fiber reinforced polymeric (FRP) composite
17、 laminates.1359-8368/$ - see front matter ? 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.07.019E-mail address: mosallam@uci.eduwww.elsevier.com/locate/compositesbComposites: Part B 38 (2007) 559
18、–574addition, this is one of the first studies where all test procedures are confirmed with the requirements of the International Code Council-Evaluation Service (ICC-ES) Acceptance Criteria AC 125 [19].4. Experimental p
19、rogram4.1. Wall specimensA total of four unreinforced red bricks large-scale wall specimens were constructed and tested to failure. The dimensions of the walls were 2.64 m · 2.64 m (8.67 ft · 8.67 ft) and one b
20、rick wide. Large wall dimensions were selected to avoid scale effects and to reflect the actual per- formance of a weak masonry wall under out-of-plane flex- ural loading conditions. Table 1 describes the wall specimens
21、evaluated in this study. As mentioned earlier, the International Code Council-Evaluation Service (ICC- ES) Acceptance Criteria AC 125 [19] procedures were fol- lowed for all tests.4.2. MortarStandard Type-S mortar was us
22、ed in constructing these walls. The mortar was mixed to the proportion specifica- tion of ASTM C-270 Standard. The average compressive strength of the mortar was obtained by testing six 50.8 mm (200) diameter · 101.
23、6 mm (400) high cylinders taken from the same batch used in fabricating the wall specimens. The average strength ðf 0 mÞ of the mortar on the day of the tests was 21.37 MPa (3100 psi).4.3. Red bricksCommon red
24、clay bricks (Castaic) readily available from building suppliers were used. The nominal dimensions were 20.32 cm (8 in.) · 10.16 cm (4 in.) · 5.72 cm (21 4 in.). Two types of tests were conducted on the red bric
25、ks: (i) a unit brick compression test to determine the ultimate compres- sive strength (refer to Fig. 2), and (ii) a prism test (refer to Fig. 3) to determine the combined compressive strength ofTable 1 Description of wa
26、ll specimensTest ID Specimen’s descriptionControl unreinforced WCONT-U As-built wall no compositesRetrofit: carbon/epoxy WC-RET-02 2 Plies of unidirectional carbon/epoxy laminate parallel to edge supports [0?]2 WC-RET-09
27、0 1 Ply of unidirectional carbon/epoxy in each orthogonal direction (perpendicular to edge supports direction) [0?/90?]1Retrofit E-glass/epoxy WE- RET-02 3 Plies of unidirectional E-glass/epoxy laminate parallel to edge
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- (節(jié)選)外文翻譯--用frp復(fù)合材料加固的無(wú)筋紅磚墻的平面外受彎性能
- (節(jié)選)外文翻譯--用frp復(fù)合材料加固的無(wú)筋紅磚墻的平面外受彎性能
- (節(jié)選)外文翻譯英文--用FRP復(fù)合材料加固的無(wú)筋紅磚墻的平面外受彎性能.pdf
- (節(jié)選)外文翻譯英文--用FRP復(fù)合材料加固的無(wú)筋紅磚墻的平面外受彎性能.pdf
- 外文翻譯--用frp復(fù)合材料加固的無(wú)筋紅磚墻的平面外受彎性能
- (節(jié)選)外文翻譯譯文--用FRP復(fù)合材料加固的無(wú)筋紅磚墻的平面外受彎性能.doc
- (節(jié)選)外文翻譯譯文--用FRP復(fù)合材料加固的無(wú)筋紅磚墻的平面外受彎性能.doc
- 裝修砌墻工藝標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、過(guò)程匯總(紅磚墻、青磚墻)
- 體外預(yù)應(yīng)力FRP筋加固水閘橋板受彎性能研究.pdf
- 碳纖維布加固FRP筋ECC--混凝土復(fù)合梁受彎性能研究.pdf
- 新型FRP筋混凝土梁受彎性能研究.pdf
- FRP筋嵌入式加固混凝土梁火災(zāi)后受彎性能研究.pdf
- 外文翻譯英文--負(fù)熱膨脹材料-復(fù)合材料的熱性能及其影響(節(jié)選)
- 混合FRP筋混凝土梁受彎性能研究.pdf
- 纖維增強(qiáng)復(fù)合材料(FRP)受剪加固砌體結(jié)構(gòu)研究.pdf
- 預(yù)應(yīng)力FRP筋混凝土梁受彎性能研究.pdf
- 外文翻譯英文--負(fù)熱膨脹材料-復(fù)合材料的熱性能及其影響(節(jié)選).pdf
- 外文翻譯英文--負(fù)熱膨脹材料-復(fù)合材料的熱性能及其影響(節(jié)選).pdf
- 鋼筋和FRP筋混合配筋增強(qiáng)ECC--混凝土復(fù)合梁受彎性能研究.pdf
- 玻璃纖維增強(qiáng)復(fù)合材料材料性能及加固受彎鋼構(gòu)件試驗(yàn)研究.pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論