版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、中南民族大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文柏拉圖與詩和詩人姓名:崔顯艷申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專業(yè):文藝學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:胡家祥20060601柏拉圖與詩和詩人 IIAbstract On one hand, Plato expels poet and poetry from his designed Republic; on the other hand, he understands glamour of poetry. Besides, he writes D
2、ialogue that may be compared with the greatest works, in which includes his contradictorary attitude towards poet and poetry. From this point of view, in this paper I will have a try to analyze the Staring point and reas
3、ons which Plato criticize poet and poetry, and Reveal potential trend and necessity that Plato defends for poet and Poetry, then further explore why this two contradictions can be combined Logically. This paper will d
4、evelop according to way of from “appearance to Essence”, and line of reasoning of “positive –negative ---combination”. In this paper chapter one will give a brief introduction to Plato’s Life experiences, times, his work
5、s and seek subjective and objective conditions that Leads to form of Plato’s ideas in poetry. In addition, it presents his Works have dramatic feature, which paves the way of developing further Discussion. Chapter two fo
6、cuses on reasons why Plato expel poet from Republic and Understand poet’s activities and his works from narrow rationality(knowledge’s understanding and evaluation)Of Plato’s family, and so scold that they tast e people’
7、s vulgar interest, advocate their desire, which make audience and readers cannot keep their mind; they are puzzled persons always absorbed in craze of soul, lack clear reason; they wants to imitate “eidos”, however, just
8、 make up hypothesis, in fact, blaspheme against Gods, so that they make people far from noumenon. Based on this understanding and evaluation, in his Republic he doesn’t leave room for poet. Chapter three will talk about
9、another contradiction, that is, Plato Defend for poet and poetry on many occasions consciously and Unconsciously. For one thing, it shows his positive view when he scolds, For another thing, it shows direct and positive
10、praise for poet and poetry On certain occasions. Plato’s attitude towards poet and poetry from Positive to negative is based on principle of wonderful life in hisUnderstanding, that is, “Limitation, Harmony, Integraty”.
11、If we say his deny for poet and poetry is “obvious education” in Plato’s Republic we can easily find, then confirmation of poet and poetry is “concealed education”, actually, these are similar. However, there has furthe
12、r basis about real unity of these two points. So pursuing further bases is main idea of chapter four. In ancient Greek there already has dispute between poetry and philosophy. To some extent, it is deviational results fr
13、om unity between poetry and philosophy. Muthos and logos originally are of same origin. Possibly it may combine by dramatic dialogues. Fortunately Plato is both poet and philosopher. So he can combine poet and philosophy
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 柏拉圖與詩和詩人.pdf
- 詩人談詩教案
- 作為政治家和詩人的屈原
- 詩、詩人與拯救——濟(jì)慈信念體系初探
- 西晉詩人的人格與詩格.pdf
- 梁陳賦得體詩與詩人心態(tài).pdf
- 詩的救贖與救贖的詩——論詩人朱湘及其詩歌.pdf
- 王佐良與“詩人譯詩”_30087.pdf
- 作為政治家和詩人的屈原_13462.pdf
- 理論家和詩人——ts艾略特的文學(xué)生涯的研究
- 意大利劇情片《絕美之城》的油畫底色和詩人氣質(zhì)
- 焦慮與偏執(zhí)——新月詩派詩人創(chuàng)作心理研究.pdf
- 血統(tǒng)、面包和詩歌:詩人之位置和位置政治之隨筆翻譯項(xiàng)目報(bào)告
- 政治抒情詩人——郭小川的詩
- 唐代邊塞詩的興盛與詩人親歷【畢業(yè)論文】
- 白洋淀詩群女詩人探論
- 明清漳州詩人古體詩用韻研究.pdf
- 《詩人玉屑》之詩法考論_39182.pdf
- 論高麗朝詩人對(duì)蘇軾詩的接受與發(fā)展_37087.pdf
- 詩人譯詩,是耶-非耶-——也談徐志摩與詩歌翻譯.pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論