版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、1785FUNDAMENTALPRINCIPLESOFTHEMETAPHYSICOFMALSbyImmanuelKanttranslatedbyThomasKingsmillAbbottPREFACEAncientGreekphilosophywasdividedintothreesciences:physicsethicslogic.Thisdivisionisperfectlysuitabletothenatureofthethin
2、gtheonlyimprovementthatcanbemadeinitistoaddtheprincipleonwhichitisbasedsothatwemaybothsatisfyourselvesofitscompletenessalsobeabletodeterminecrectlythenecessarysubdivisions.Allrationalknowledgeiseithermaterialfmal:thefmer
3、considerssomeobjectthelatterisconcernedonlywiththefmoftheunderstingofthereasonitselfwiththeuniversallawsofthoughtingeneralwithoutdistinctionofitsobjects.Fmalphilosophyiscalledlogic.Materialphilosophyhoweverhastodowithdet
4、erminateobjectsthelawstowhichtheyaresubjectisagaintwofoldftheselawsareeitherlawsofnatureoffreedom.Thescienceofthefmerisphysicsthatofthelatterethicstheyarealsocallednaturalphilosophymalphilosophyrespectively.Logiccannotha
5、veanyempiricalpartthatisapartinwhichtheuniversalnecessarylawsofthoughtshouldrestongroundstakenfromexperienceotherwiseitwouldnotbelogici.e.acanonftheunderstingthereasonvalidfallthoughtcapableofdemonstration.Naturalmalphil
6、osophyonthecontrarycaneachhavetheirempiricalpartsincethefmerhastodeterminethelawsofnatureasanobjectofexperiencethelatterthelawsofthehumanwillsofarasitisaffectedbynature:thefmerhoweverbeinglawsaccdingtowhicheverythingdoes
7、happenthelatterlawsaccdingtowhicheverythingoughttohappen.Ethicshowevermustalsoconsidertheconditionsunderwhichwhatoughttohappenfrequentlydoesnot.Wemaycallallphilosophyempiricalsofarasitisbasedongroundsofexperience:ontheot
8、herbthatwhichdeliversitsdoctrinesfromapriiprinciplesalonewemaycallpurephilosophy.Whenthelatterismerelyfmalitislogicifitisrestrictedtodefiniteobjectsoftheunderstingitismetaphysic.motivesuchapreceptwhileitmaybeapracticalru
9、lecanneverbecalledamallaw.Thusnotonlyaremallawswiththeirprinciplesessentiallydistinguishedfromeveryotherkindofpracticalknowledgeinwhichthereisanythingempiricalbutallmalphilosophyrestswhollyonitspurepart.Whenappliedtomani
10、tdoesnotbrowtheleastthingfromtheknowledgeofmanhimself(anthropology)butgiveslawsapriitohimasarationalbeing.Nodoubttheselawsrequireajudgementsharpenedbyexperienceinderontheonehtodistinguishinwhatcasestheyareapplicableonthe
11、othertoprocurefthemaccesstothewillofthemaneffectualinfluenceonconductsincemanisactedonbysomanyinclinationsthatthoughcapableoftheideaofapracticalpurereasonheisnotsoeasilyabletomakeiteffectiveinconcretoinhislife.Ametaphysi
12、cofmalsistherefeindispensablynecessarynotmerelyfspeculativereasonsindertoinvestigatethesourcesofthepracticalprincipleswhicharetobefoundapriiinourreasonbutalsobecausemalsthemselvesareliabletoallstsofcruptionaslongaswearew
13、ithoutthatcluesupremecanonbywhichtoestimatethemcrectly.Finderthatanactionshouldbemallygooditisnotenoughthatitconfmtothemallawbutitmustalsobedonefthesakeofthelawotherwisethatconfmityisonlyverycontingentuncertainsinceaprin
14、ciplewhichisnotmalalthoughitmaynowthenproduceactionsconfmabletothelawwillalsooftenproduceactionswhichcontradictit.Nowitisonlyapurephilosophythatwecanlookfthemallawinitspuritygenuineness(inapracticalmatterthisisoftheutmos
15、tconsequence):wemusttherefebeginwithpurephilosophy(metaphysic)withoutittherecannotbeanymalphilosophyatall.Thatwhichminglesthesepureprincipleswiththeempiricaldoesnotdeservethenameofphilosophy(fwhatdistinguishesphilosophyf
16、romcommonrationalknowledgeisthatittreatsinseparatescienceswhatthelatteronlycomprehendsconfusedly)muchlessdoesitdeservethatofmalphilosophysincebythisconfusionitevenspoilsthepurityofmalsthemselvescounteractsitsownend.Letit
17、notbethoughthoweverthatwhatisheredemedisalreadyextantinthepropaedeuticprefixedbythecelebratedWolftohismalphilosophynamelyhissocalledgeneralpracticalphilosophythattherefewehavenottostrikeintoanentirelynewfield.justbecause
18、itwastobeageneralpracticalphilosophyithasnottakenintoconsiderationawillofanyparticularkindsayonewhichshouldbedeterminedsolelyfromapriiprincipleswithoutanyempiricalmotiveswhichwemightcallapurewillbutvolitioningeneralwitha
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 否定形而上學(xué),延展形而上學(xué)?
- 偽善的道德形而上學(xué)形態(tài)
- 何謂形而上學(xué)
- 偽善的道德形而上學(xué)形態(tài).pdf
- 道德形而上學(xué)基礎(chǔ)讀書報告
- 《形而上學(xué)》(英文)亞里士多德
- 超越形而上學(xué)
- 形而上學(xué)淺思
- 生活世界與形而上學(xué)
- 論叔本華“美的形而上學(xué)”
- 涵義的形而上學(xué)研究
- 作為直覺的形而上學(xué)——形而上學(xué)導(dǎo)言對科學(xué)分析的批評
- 形而上學(xué)的遠(yuǎn)與近——海德格爾與形而上學(xué)之解構(gòu)
- 形而上學(xué)的流變.pdf
- 作為直覺的形而上學(xué)——《形而上學(xué)導(dǎo)言》對科學(xué)分析的批評.pdf
- 形而上學(xué)終結(jié)了嗎?.pdf
- 尼采反形而上學(xué)思想研究
- 形而上學(xué)的遠(yuǎn)與近——海德格爾與形而上學(xué)之解構(gòu).pdf
- 涵義的形而上學(xué)研究.pdf
- 《老子》形而上學(xué)思想研究.pdf
評論
0/150
提交評論