24075.中美初中數(shù)學(xué)教材幾何內(nèi)容的比較研究——以“全等三角形”和“直角三角形”為例

1、㈣淵學(xué)陵代碼：10270分類號(hào)lG42學(xué)號(hào)；152502749上磣腳范大墨碩士專業(yè)學(xué)位論文中美初中數(shù)學(xué)教材幾何內(nèi)容的比較研究——以“全等三角形”和“直角三角形”為例學(xué)院：墊理蘭暄專業(yè)學(xué)位類別：麴直亟專業(yè)領(lǐng)域：堂型墊堂(數(shù)莖2研究生姓名：銎盤墼指導(dǎo)教師：筮焦堊答辯日期：2Q!Z生旦AbstractShanghaiNormalUniversityMasterofPhilosophyTeachingmaterialisthecarderofc

2、urriculumimplementationTheteachingmaterialofeachcountryreflectstheregionalcharacteristicsofthecountryItreflectstheeducationalideasofacountryandtheeducationalthoughtsofthetextbookwritersTextbookresearchisoneofthecoreprobl

3、emsincurriculumandteachingresearchItisthebasicguaranteefortheimprovementofteachingqualityandtheimplementationofteachingreformItisalsoacommonconcernamongprimaryandsecondaryschoolteachersTherefore，thecomparativestudyoftext

4、booksindifferentcountriesishelpfultobeRerunderstandthedifficultyoftheteachingmaterialandthedifferencesbetweenthetextbooksofothercountries’Itishelpfultoprovidefurtherreferencefortheresearchers，thetextbookwritersandtheeduc

5、atorswhoareconcemedabouteducationAtthesametime，itisalsohelpfulforteacherstodeepentheunderstandingofteachingmaterialsandimprovethequalityofclassroomteachingThisarticlemakesacomparativestudyofthegeometriccontentsofmathtext

6、booksinjuniormiddleschoolbetweenChinaandtheUnitedStatesItstudiesfromtwoaspectsofthebreadthanddepthofthecurriculumwith”congruenttriangles”and”righttriangles”asanexampleItmakesacomparativeanalysisofthecontentsbetweenthetwo

7、materialsfromtheaspectsoftheorderofteachingmaterials，theproportionofcoreknowledgepoints，thedifferencesofknowledgepoints，thelevelofknowledgeobjectives，thenumberofquestionsandtheircomprehensivedifficultythetypesofexercises

8、andthecomprehensivedifficultyofexercisesInordertofindoutthesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthetwocountries’mathematictextbooksAndfinallydrawthefollowingconclusions：(1)ThearrangementofthecontentsofChinesetextbooksiScoher

9、ent，butthecomparativeofthecontentisnotasgoodasthatoftheUnitedStates(2)TheproportionofthecoreknowledgepointsinChinesetextbooksislowerthanthatintheUnitedStates(3)ThetargetlevelofChineseteachingmaterialsishigherthanthatofAm

10、ericantextbooks(4)ThenumberofChinesetextbookexamplesiSlOWthanAmericantextbook，butthedepthoftheexamplesishigherthanthatofAmericantextbooks(5)ThedifficultyofChinesetextbookexercisesiSdeeperthanthatofAmericantextbooksinsome