WTO協(xié)議的文體特點(diǎn)分析.pdf

1、湖南大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文WTO協(xié)議的文體特點(diǎn)分析姓名：陳勇申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：外國(guó)語(yǔ)言學(xué)及應(yīng)用語(yǔ)言學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：肖云南20040415w’I、0協(xié)議的文體特點(diǎn)分析ABSTRACTThispaperdescribesandanalyzesthestylisticfeaturesofWTOagreements(Englishversion)fromfourlevels：grapheticsandgraphologylexis，syntax，a

2、ndtextwiththetheoryofmodernstylisticsandtheviewofspeechactsandiconicityItisexpectedthatthesedescriptionandinterpretationmayshedsomeenlighteninglightforunderstandingandtranslatingtheseagreementsanddocumentsofothersimilari

3、tiesandwillposefurtherresearchquestionsinthestudyoflegallanguageTheWorldTradeOrganization(WTO)isthelegalandorganizationalbasisformultilateraltradesystemAtitsheartaretheWTOagreementsAstheseagreementsimposeobligationsandco

4、nferrightsonWTOmembers，theybelongtolegislativedocumentsTheEnglishlanguageusedtodrafttheseruleshasspecificfeaturesItisdifferentfromordinarylanguagewithrespecttovocabularyandstyleThislanguageiscalledlegalEnglishortheEnglis

5、hlanguageoflaw(thelanguageoflaw)LegallanguagemeansthelanguageorapartofthelanguagethatisusedindescribingtheconceptsinlegalscienceandlawsuitsDavidMeUinkoff(1963)，DavidCrystalandDerekDavy(1969)，HouWeirui(1988)，ZhangDelu(199

6、8)havemadevarietyanalysisonit，Bhatia(1993)hasdonegenreanalysisonlegaldiscourseGarzone(2000)，ZhaoYuhong(2001)，AyferAltay(2002)andotherscholarshavemaderesearchesforthepurposeoflawtranslationButfewresearchesaremadewiththeth

7、eoryofpragmaticsexceptthatdonebyAnnaTrosborg(1995)andZhangXinhong(2000)ItisalsaretodescribethelinguisticfeaturesoflegislativedocumentsofeconomyandtradeDavidCrystalandDerekDavy(1969)havehadadetaileddiscussiononthestylisti

8、canalyticalframeworkTheyproposetodescribethefeaturesoftextatthefollowinglevels：(1)grapheticsandgraphology；(2)phoneticsandphonology；(3)syntax；(4)lexisand(5)semanticsLaterstylisticiansoftenadoptedthisframeworkVijayKBhatia(

9、1993)suggeststhreelevelsoflinguisticanalysis：(1)analysisoflexico—grammaticalfeatures；(2)analysisoftext—patterningortextualization；(3)structuralinterpretationofthetext—genreGenreanalystmayconcentrateononeormoreoftheabovel

10、evelsoflinguisticrealizationInthisthesis，WedescribeandanalvzethelinguisticfeaturesofWTOagreements，mainlyfollowingtheframeworksetbvDavidCrystalandDerekDavytogetherwithBhatia’sanalysislevelsapplyingAustinandSearle’sspeecha