我國黨紀(jì)反腐和司法反腐關(guān)聯(lián)性研究.pdf

1、I一、學(xué)位論文獨(dú)創(chuàng)性聲明 一、學(xué)位論文獨(dú)創(chuàng)性聲明本人聲明所呈交的學(xué)位論文是本人在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下進(jìn)行的研究工作及取得的研究成果。據(jù)我所知，除了文中特別加以標(biāo)注和致謝的地方外，論文中不包含其他人已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫過的研究成果， 也不包含為獲得南昌大學(xué)或其他教育機(jī)構(gòu)的學(xué)位或證書而使用過的材料。 與我一同工作的同志對本研究所做的任何貢獻(xiàn)均已在論文中作了明確的說明并表示謝意。學(xué)位論文作者簽名 （手寫） ： 簽字日期： 年 月 日二、 二、學(xué)位論文版權(quán)使用

2、授權(quán)書 學(xué)位論文版權(quán)使用授權(quán)書本學(xué)位論文作者完全了解南昌大學(xué)有關(guān)保留、 使用學(xué)位論文的規(guī)定， 同意學(xué)校有權(quán)保留并向國家有關(guān)部門或機(jī)構(gòu)送交論文的復(fù)印件和電子版， 允許論文被查閱和借閱。 本人授權(quán)南昌大學(xué)可以將學(xué)位論文的全部或部分內(nèi)容編入有關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)庫進(jìn)行檢索，可以采用影印、縮印或掃描等復(fù)制手段保存、匯編本學(xué)位論文。同時(shí)授權(quán)北京萬方數(shù)據(jù)股份有限公司和中國學(xué)術(shù)期刊 （光盤版） 電子雜志社將本學(xué)位論文收錄到《中國學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫》和《中國優(yōu)秀博碩

3、士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫》中全文發(fā)表，并通過網(wǎng)絡(luò)向社會(huì)公眾提供信息服務(wù)，同意按“章程”規(guī)定享受相關(guān)權(quán)益。學(xué)位論文作者簽名（手寫）： 導(dǎo)師簽名（手寫）：簽字日期： 年 月 日 簽字日期： 年 月 日論文題目 我國黨紀(jì)反腐和司法反腐關(guān)聯(lián)性研究姓 名 齊正奎 學(xué)號(hào) 415315414068 論文級(jí)別 博士□ 碩士□院/系/所 法學(xué)院 專 業(yè) 法律碩士（非法學(xué)）E_mail 676686602@qq.com備注：□公開 □保密（向校學(xué)位辦申請獲批準(zhǔn)

4、為“保密”， 年 月后公開）ABSTRACTIIIABSTRACTAnti-corruption is a campaign bonded with the long-term development,complexity, and systemic issues of China and the Communist Party of China. Sincethe 18th CPC National Congress, Party c

5、entral Committee of CPC has raised theimportance of inner-Party self-discipline and self-management to highlight thecultivation of a clean government and anti-corruption while keeps striking oncorruption whatever size th

6、ey are by “cracking down on both tigers and flies”, andcontinues high pressure towards corruption crimes. So far, precaution andanti-corruption work along with two routines. One is led by CPC and its in-Partyself-discipl

7、ine, using in-Party restrictions and punishments to regulate Partymembers and penalize any violator; the other is backed with the Administration ofJustice by evaluating corruption crime, declaring corruptive officers gui

8、lty andsentence certain criminal penalties.When it comes to practice, the Party's anti-corruption and judicialanti-corruption each have advantages and disadvantages. The Party’s anti-corruptionappears to be more flex

9、ible, and high efficient, while judicial anti-corruptionmanifest fairness and order in a better way as it has more advantages while applyingto the law. Therefore, it has become a hot spot on current research that how to

10、makeboth methods a potent mix to anti-corruption campaign.This article is backgrounded by multiple subjects and tries to analyzeconnections among these subjects from a judicial angle, and then tries todemonstrating the c

11、onnections between Party’s anti-corruption and judicialanti-corruption with research and analysis on problems these two anti-corruptionmethods might meet when they conflict, transform, and cooperate. This article willals

12、o discuss the combination of both methods and how to optimize such combination.In the end, the author points out three suggestions, first, emphasizes the combinationof Party’s anti-corruption and judicial anti-corruption