中國出口貿(mào)易專利權(quán)法律保護研究.pdf

1、分類號UDC密級單位代碼!Q151中國出口貿(mào)易專利權(quán)法律保護研究楊驍賢指導(dǎo)教師屈廣清職稱教授學(xué)位授予單位大連海事大學(xué)申請學(xué)位級別碩士學(xué)科與專業(yè)國際法學(xué)論文完成目期2007年2月論文答辯日期2007年3月答辯委員會主席寸了俄覆英文摘要TheResearchOnTheLegalProtectionOfThePatentRightsInExportingCommerceAbstractSincetheChineseentryintoWTO，o

2、urcountryhasbeenkeepingahighspeedintheexportingtradeandeconomicdevelopmentIntellectualpropertytakesagreatproportioninvariouskindsoftrade，andpatentrightisplayingamajorroleAtpresent，thewaveofintellectualrightlaunchedbythem

3、ultinationalcompaniesisimpacting乒eatlyonourcountry，thelitigationcausedbythedisputeresultedfromthepatentrightconcerningforeignaffairsisonacontinualrisingtrendThereisalsoanincreasinglitigantnumberconcerningvariouscountries

4、andregionsTheamountoftradefrictionandlossesresultedfromtechnologybarriersufferedbytheexportingcompaniesisastonishingThereasonliesinourdeficiectexperienceandpreparationemployingintellectualpropertyprotectionsystemtakingpa

5、rtininternationalmarkets，thelagoflegislation，theunestablishedsocialsurrmmdingsofintellectualpropertyprotection，thelackofinnovationabilityfromsomedomesticexportingcompanies，andtheabuseofintellectualrightsofsomemultination

6、alcompaniesThroughthedisputecasesconcerningforeignaffairsandthecomparisonoflegalprotectionofpatentrightindifferentcountriesandregions，theauthorthinkthatweshouldbuildupourconsummatesocialisteconomysystemassoonaspossible，f

7、ostertheatmosphereofsocially—wideprotectionofintellectualproperty，improvethestandardandabilityofintellectualpropertyprotectionofourdomesticcompaniesandnationalorganizations，fullysupportthetechnologyinnovationThegovernmen

8、tshouldstudytheoverallstrategyofpatentrightsprotectionactively，andthebusinessshouldbewellpreparedfortherisksinthepatentrightsprotectionaction，emphasizethecultivationofinnovationability，enlargetheamountofindependentpatent

9、，conductthestrategyof‘threedimensionalprotection’focusedonourowncoretech，foundthepre—warningmechanism，mastertheskillofprotectingandanti—protectionofintellectualproperty，establishthejudicialreviewsystemintheintellectualpr