版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、8300 英文單詞, 英文單詞,4.5 萬(wàn)英文字符,中文 萬(wàn)英文字符,中文 1.5 萬(wàn)字 萬(wàn)字文獻(xiàn)出處: 文獻(xiàn)出處:An agency theoretic analysis of value creation through management buy-outs of family firms[J]. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2012, 3(4):197-206.An agency t
2、heoretic analysis of value creation through management buy-outs of family firmsJames J. Chrisman, Jess H. Chua, Lloyd P. Steier, Mike Wright, D’Lisa N. McKeeAbstractFamily firms without able and willing family successors
3、 are frequently sold to non-family managers through management buy-outs (MBOs). Whether MBOs create value is thought to be dependent upon the ability to reduce owner–manager agency costs. In this article we examine the a
4、gency costs of MBOs that acquire family firms. We contribute to theory by arguing that in such situations, value creation by reducing agency costs will depend upon pre-MBO agency costs, the ability to solve the double ag
5、ency problem, and the relationship between the cost of agency control mechanisms and the residual losses from opportunism before and after the MBO.Keywords: Agency theory; Family business; Management buy-outs1. Introduct
6、ionFamily firms account for the majority of firms around the world (La Porta, Lo´ pez-de-Silanes, Shleifer, Morck Chua, Chrisman, Lim, Lubatkin, Scholes, Wright, Westhead, Burrows, McConaughy, Matthews, Arthur
7、s, Hoskisson, Busenitz, Bruton, Filatotchev, Chahine, Child Wasserman, 2003). Researchers typically assume that transitions in family firms will involve the family. However, a variety of factors associated with the ab
8、ility and intentions of individual family members, family relationships, strategic context, finances, and transition processes can sometimes make intra-family succession impossible or undesirable (DeMassis, Chua, Tagiur
9、i Ward, 1997).MBOs are among the most important and desirable alternatives for selling a firm outside the family, partly because some MBO scenarios are more likely (though not guaranteed) to preserve some of the origina
10、l identity of the firm after the sale than other selling options such as IPOs (Scholes et al., 2007). In fact, after the MBO, some family members may continue to be employed in the firm (Howorth et al., 2004) and many fi
11、rms retain at least a little ‘familiness’ even after substantial ownership has been transferred to outsiders (Fiegener, 2010).However, from the vantage point of the acquirers, success or failure is measured not by contin
12、ued family involvement or even strictly in terms of profitability. Rather success is measured by the extent to which incremental value is created after the transfer of ownership. Acquirers typically have to pay a control
13、 premium (Finnerty & Emery, 2004) and therefore must be able to add to firm value over and above the premium paid to be successful. When the firm is owned by a family, the hurdle may be even higher because family own
14、ers tend to attach socioemotional value to the firm (Go´ mez-Mejia, Hynes, Nunez-Nickel, & Moyano-Fuentes, 2007), which can further increase the selling premium demanded (Zellweger, Kellermanns, Chrisman, &
15、Chua, 2012).As mentioned above, value creation by the owners post-MBO will depend on economic conditions, strategy, governance, organizational structure, systems, culture, taxes, and agency costs, among others. If we abs
16、tract from the uncontrollable economic, tax, and national cultural conditions, then what remains to affect firm value are decisions regarding governance, strategies, structure, policies, tactics, systems, etc. which woul
17、d be determined by the family before the MBO and by the non-family owners afterward. If, indeed, value creation after the MBO is to be achieved through optimal changes in governance, strategy, etc., one may legitimately
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]管理層收購(gòu)?fù)馕姆g--通過對(duì)家族企業(yè)的管理層收購(gòu)進(jìn)行價(jià)值創(chuàng)造的代理理論分析(英文)
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]管理層收購(gòu)?fù)馕姆g--通過對(duì)家族企業(yè)的管理層收購(gòu)進(jìn)行價(jià)值創(chuàng)造的代理理論分析中英全
- 2012年管理層收購(gòu)?fù)馕姆g--通過對(duì)家族企業(yè)的管理層收購(gòu)進(jìn)行價(jià)值創(chuàng)造的代理理論分析
- 2012年管理層收購(gòu)?fù)馕姆g--通過對(duì)家族企業(yè)的管理層收購(gòu)進(jìn)行價(jià)值創(chuàng)造的代理理論分析.DOCX
- 2012年管理層收購(gòu)?fù)馕姆g--通過對(duì)家族企業(yè)的管理層收購(gòu)進(jìn)行價(jià)值創(chuàng)造的代理理論分析(英文).PDF
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]管理層收購(gòu)?fù)馕姆g--管理層收購(gòu)中的私募股權(quán)和企業(yè)家管理(節(jié)選)
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]管理層收購(gòu)?fù)馕姆g--管理層收購(gòu)中的私募股權(quán)和企業(yè)家管理(英文)
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]管理層收購(gòu)?fù)馕姆g--管理層收購(gòu)中的私募股權(quán)和企業(yè)家管理中英全
- 2013年管理層收購(gòu)?fù)馕姆g--管理層收購(gòu)中的私募股權(quán)和企業(yè)家管理
- 管理層收購(gòu)與創(chuàng)業(yè)機(jī)會(huì)【外文翻譯】
- 2013年管理層收購(gòu)?fù)馕姆g--管理層收購(gòu)中的私募股權(quán)和企業(yè)家管理(節(jié)選).DOCX
- 2013年管理層收購(gòu)?fù)馕姆g--管理層收購(gòu)中的私募股權(quán)和企業(yè)家管理(英文).PDF
- 企業(yè)管理層收購(gòu)探討
- 企業(yè)管理層收購(gòu)理論與實(shí)踐
- 管理層收購(gòu)的理論與現(xiàn)實(shí).pdf
- 管理層收購(gòu)理論分析及規(guī)制研究.pdf
- 管理層收購(gòu):理論分析與實(shí)證研究.pdf
- 管理層收購(gòu)的理論與方法研究.pdf
- 國(guó)有企業(yè)管理層收購(gòu)問題研究——論管理層收購(gòu)中政府行為的調(diào)整.pdf
- 管理層收購(gòu)中的盈余管理剖析
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論