版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、字?jǐn)?shù):英文 字?jǐn)?shù):英文 4831 4831 單詞, 單詞,26220 26220 字符;中文 字符;中文 8246 8246 漢字 漢字出處: 出處:Watson Watson H, H, Rodrigues Rodrigues R. R. Bringing Bringing privacy privacy into into the the fold: fold: Considerations Considerations for f
2、or the the use use of of social social media media in in crisis crisis management[J]. management[J]. Journal Journal of of Contingencies Contingencies and and Crisis Crisis Management, Management, 2018, 2018, 26(1): 26(1
3、): 89-98. 89-98.外文文獻(xiàn) 外文文獻(xiàn) Bringing Privacy into the Fold: Considerations for the Use of Social Media in Crisis ManagementAbstract This article presents findings from a European project on the Contribution of Social Med
4、ia in Crisis management (COSMIC). While limited, the findings are based on desk‐based research and a stakeholder workshop. The authors find there are a number of inherent privacy‐related challenges to be considered, if t
5、hose involved in crisis management activities are to optimally use social media. They analyse some applicable challenges such as surveillance, (unrestricted) collection and processing of personal and sensitive personal i
6、nformation, and key European legal provisions that apply, including the General Data Protection Regulation. In conclusion, the authors argue that if not appropriately addressed, these challenges may result not only in ha
7、rms to individuals and society, but also in a loss of institutional reputation and trust.1.IntroductionThe use of social media in crisis management is currently enjoying positive attention from the actors involved in uti
8、lizing social media during the response stage of a crisis (e.g., public authorities, emergency managers and humanitarian organizations), as well as by members of the public who, in some countries, are also 2.MethodologyT
9、his article is based on research conducted for the EU‐funded COSMIC (Contribution of Social Media in Crisis management) project that ended in March 2015. For COSMIC, engaging with discussions concerning the ethical and p
10、rivacy considerations of the use of social media in crisis management was essential in ensuring the project promoted transparent and ethical practices in (future) crisis management activities. Within the project, the foc
11、us on privacy and ethical considerations employed desk‐based research and a validation workshop to identify privacy challenges related to the use of social media in crisis management.During the desk‐based research, the a
12、uthors analysed content relating to social media and privacy from peer‐reviewed journal articles, reports, event reports and relevant legislation. The selection of articles was based on a systematic online search using (
13、related) keywords in the period May 2013 to October 2014. Keywords included the following: ‘privacy issues and social media’, ‘privacy social media challenges’, ‘privacy, social media and disasters’, ‘social media and le
14、gal challenges in disasters’, ‘social media, privacy harms’ and ‘legal guidance social media’. The articles’ abstract and/or executive summary was examined for relevance – any articles that were deemed irrelevant were re
15、moved from the review. Lastly, articles were analysed and subsequent material was identified to be included in the review. The material was used to complete a report detailing the various issues identified in the review
16、relating to privacy and the use of social media in crises. The report was internally reviewed by other project consortium members. In addition, the preliminary findings were discussed with emergency managers and other re
17、searchers in the field of crisis management during a validation workshop which was held in Gothenburg, Sweden, on 21 May 2014. The workshop included several presentations on COSMIC findings, including a short presentatio
18、n on privacy and ethical implications highlighted in the report, followed by a questions and answers session – allowing for discussion. The workshop had 32 participants recruited via the project website, social media and
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]新聞傳播學(xué)專(zhuān)業(yè)外文翻譯—將隱私納入其中:在危機(jī)管理中使用社交媒體的考慮因素(節(jié)選)
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]新聞傳播學(xué)專(zhuān)業(yè)外文翻譯—將隱私納入其中在危機(jī)管理中使用社交媒體的考慮因素(原文)
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]新聞傳播學(xué)專(zhuān)業(yè)外文翻譯—將隱私納入其中在危機(jī)管理中使用社交媒體的考慮因素(中英全
- 2018年新聞傳播學(xué)專(zhuān)業(yè)外文翻譯—將隱私納入其中在危機(jī)管理中使用社交媒體的考慮因素
- 2018年新聞傳播學(xué)專(zhuān)業(yè)外文翻譯—將隱私納入其中在危機(jī)管理中使用社交媒體的考慮因素(節(jié)選).DOCX
- 2018年新聞傳播學(xué)專(zhuān)業(yè)外文翻譯—將隱私納入其中在危機(jī)管理中使用社交媒體的考慮因素(原文).PDF
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]社交媒體外文翻譯--應(yīng)急管理中的社交媒體:twitter作為向公眾傳播風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的工具(節(jié)選)
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]社交媒體外文翻譯--應(yīng)急管理中的社交媒體twitter作為向公眾傳播風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的工具(節(jié)選)
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]--外文翻譯--新聞行業(yè)危機(jī)的構(gòu)建
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]社交媒體外文翻譯--應(yīng)急管理中的社交媒體twitter作為向公眾傳播風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的工具(英文)
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]社交媒體外文翻譯--社交媒體對(duì)奢侈品品牌管理的潛力
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]社交媒體外文翻譯--應(yīng)急管理中的社交媒體twitter作為向公眾傳播風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的工具中英全
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]社交媒體外文翻譯--社交媒體對(duì)奢侈品品牌管理的潛力(英文)
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]社交媒體外文翻譯--社交媒體對(duì)奢侈品品牌管理的潛力中英全
- 新聞媒體傳播專(zhuān)業(yè)外文翻譯--傳播起什么作用(譯文)
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]--新聞媒體外文翻譯--大眾傳媒中還存在危機(jī)嗎(如果曾經(jīng)存在危機(jī))?以英國(guó)為例(節(jié)選)
- 新聞媒體傳播專(zhuān)業(yè)外文翻譯--傳播起什么作用(英文)
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]--外文翻譯--社交媒體成功因素的認(rèn)定--市場(chǎng)營(yíng)銷(xiāo)角度中英全
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]傳播學(xué)外文翻譯--可持續(xù)性科學(xué)中的大眾傳播研究
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]物流專(zhuān)業(yè)快遞行業(yè)外文翻譯—客戶(hù)為何打算使用快遞服務(wù)(節(jié)選)
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論