[雙語翻譯]外文翻譯-醫(yī)學(xué)圖像水印基準(zhǔn)

1、2380 單詞， 單詞，1.3 萬英文字符，中文 萬英文字符，中文 3400 漢字 漢字出處： 出處：Navas K A, Sasikumar M, Sreevidya S. A Benchmark for Medical Image Watermarking[C]// International Workshop on Systems, Signals and Image Processing, 2007 and, Eurasip

2、Conference Focused on Speech and Image Processing, Multimedia Communications and Services. IEEE, 2007:237-240.畢業(yè)設(shè)計(論文)外文資料翻譯系 ： 信息工程系 信息工程系 專 業(yè)： 業(yè)： 網(wǎng)絡(luò)工程 網(wǎng)絡(luò)工程 班 級： 級： 姓 名： 名：

3、 學(xué) 號： 號： 附 件： 件： 1.外文資料翻譯譯文；2.外文原文。 指導(dǎo)教師評語：簽名： 年 月 日be lossless because of the stringent requirements on high quality in medical applications; however the number of

4、embedded bits should be large enough for the clinicians to write their diagnosis report. Some of the available watermarking techniques used for embedding text information into medical images can be found in [2,3,4].Po

5、pular Benchmarks: The important available benchmarks are Stirmark, Checkmark, Optimark and Certimark. All the these benchmarks share the common inefficiency of providing a platform for evaluating all kinds of image water

6、marking methods. This makes a room for research on devising a benchmark for all kinds of image watermarking.3. A NOVEL BENCHMARK FOR MEDICAL IMAGE WATERMARKINGAn ideal benchmarking procedure should involve examining th

7、e set of mutually dependent parameters of the watermarking system and it should clearly optimize the trade off between various constraints of watermarking. Various performance metrics are used to evaluate these parameter

8、s based on a specific application. The requirements of watermarking such as imperceptibility, capacity and robustness are hampering each other. Therefore, a trade off is essential between these parameters. A proper evalu

9、ation has to ensure that all the selected requirements are met to a certain level of assurance. The evaluation method for medical image watermarking techniques differs from the other benchmarks because of the following

10、constraints.The requirements of watermarking such as imperceptibility, capacity and robustness are hampering each other. Therefore, a trade off is essential between these parameters. A proper evaluation has to ensure tha

11、t all the selected requirements are met to a certain level of assurance. The evaluation method for medical image watermarking techniques differs from the other benchmarks because of the following constraints.3.1 Cover

12、Image Set The benchmark incorporates a number of cover images of varying size. The medical images are available in different modalities such as CT, MRI, US, and X-ray. The Hospital Information System contains Integrate

13、d Medical Image Database and Retrieval System that enables doctors to browse patient images at any time. Such a system allows medical images in different modalities to be integrated into an image database server with th

14、e DICOM standard. Digital watermarking can imperceptibly embed messages without changing image size or format. So the watermarked medical image can conform to the DICOM format.3.2 Capacity Though the capacity of waterm