版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
1、2350 英文單詞, 英文單詞,12500 英文字符,中文 英文字符,中文 3900 字文獻出處: 文獻出處:Procedia Economics and Finance 6 (2013) 444 - 448The Value of Brand EquityCamelia Budac, Lia BaltadorAbstractThis paper aims to be a brief presentation of brand equi
2、ty as a provider of strategic advantages for companies that own brands. Successful management of a brand must be focused on values capitalization so that these attributes could represent a natural extension of general pe
3、rception. The stated goal of any brand manager is to strengthen the brand values so that they may be easily recognizable and identifiable to the public.Keywords: brand; brand equity; brand valuation; best brands; perform
4、ance indicators.1. IntroductionBranding is designing and managing brands to increase their net value. This activity is also called brand management; either of these two definitions name basically the same thing stated ab
5、ove. In his book “Brand Simple“, Allen P. Adamson (2009) defines branding as “the execution and management of things that determine how people perceive the brand.“Like any other asset, brand management is very important
6、for the success of the company in the market. “If launched and supported effectively, the brand is a major corporate resource - sometimes the most valuable financial asset of an organization. The brand, as finance, inves
7、tment, human resources, research and development, marketing, information technology and other corporate resources, needs authority, rules, proper funding, commitment and management. If thus supported the brand-resource w
8、ill be as effective as any other resource, if not, the resource is exhausted.“(Olins 2009)Brand design, launch and management involve both human and financial resources and the cooperation of several professionals from d
9、ifferent disciplines such as design, marketing, human resources, finance and management. The brand consulting agency has the role of management and coordination in the process of branding and the general manager is the m
10、ain responsible within the company. Branding involves a well organized process, with clear stages, whose complexity varies only for reasons related to the size of the organization starting such a project. This process, t
11、ogether with its component stages, each stage specificities and deliverables that can be obtained at the end of each stage will be dealt with below. It is an accurate methodology that requires a mix of investigation capa
12、bilities, strategic thinking, and excellence in design as well as project management.David Aaker defines brand as “a distinctive name or symbol intended to identify the goods as belonging to a certain producer and to dif
13、ferentiate them from the competition. Besides brands there are also consumer brands (goods) which have no personality, no life. “(2006)2. Understanding brand equityBranding decisions are often made under pressure to achi
14、eve short-term performance. This can be achieved by exploiting the brand, leading consequently to its erosion, because the brand is extended to such an extent that its basic associations get weaker and weaker in their ef
15、fect. When the construction of brands is worn down, the loyalty decreases and prices become priority.3. Models used in brand valuationA thorough approach to brand valuation techniques implies widely accepted financial te
16、chniques as well as future discounted cash flows (Discounted Cash Flow). To reach these cash flows related to the brand there are used two main approaches. One of them is apparently simple: it applies a royalty rate on t
17、otal sales forecast upon the theory that if you did not have your own brand, you should have a license for the brand from a third party and pay a fee. In other words, by having your own brand, you “save“ the fee for each
18、 product sold. The difficulty is to find relevant rates, especially where there is a no history and a critical amount of transactions (for example the case of the Romanian market).A second approach, more complex is the o
19、ne used by Interbrand (Best Global Brands 2012) and it implies a “dissecting“ of the profit of business until the brand contribution is identified. In both approaches the measurement of the force/stability of the brand i
20、s necessary in order to prove first, that it exists and to place it on a certain scale of risk involved.The most recent analysis released by Interbrand (2012) shows that the most valuable brand remains Coca-Cola (77.84 b
21、illion dollars), while Apple (76.568 billion dollars) goes on second place. Facebook (5.4 billion dollars) first enters the ranking and Google ($ 70 billion) surpasses Microsoft (58 billion dollars) for the first time.Co
22、ca-Cola, Apple and IBM are the best three brands in the world and Facebook first enters Interbrand ranking, on the 69th place, after the highest initial public offer in history. Google's value has increased by 26%, s
23、urpassing Microsoft competitor, which this year is placed on the 5th position.In order to identify the first 100 most valuable brands in the world, Interbrand has taken into consideration three aspects: financial perform
24、ance in goods and services provided by the brand, the role of the brand that plays in influencing consumer^ choice and the extent to which the brand may require premium (higher) prices or may increase permanently the com
25、pany’s revenue.Among the brands with higher value in 2012 compared to last year there is Apple, a company whose value increased by 129% in the last year, thus registering the highest growth in the ranking of most valuabl
26、e brands developed by Interbrand.The best positions in the Interbrand rankings have the brands from technology, given that five of the ten top positions are occupied by Apple, Google, Microsoft, Intel and Samsung.The tab
27、le 1 shows the top of 25 brands according to the classification developed by Interbrand as well as the current value and the evolution or involution in relation to the previous year.Table 1. The Top 25 BrandsRank Brand R
28、egion/Country Sector Brand value($ m) Change in Brand value1 COCA-COLA United States Beverages 77,839 +8%2 APPLE United States Electronics 76,568 +129%3 IBM United States Business Services 75,532 +8%4 GOOGLE United State
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- [雙語翻譯]外文翻譯--品牌資產(chǎn)的價值(英文)
- [雙語翻譯]外文翻譯--品牌資產(chǎn)的價值中英全
- [雙語翻譯]品牌資產(chǎn)外文翻譯--品牌個性和促銷對品牌資產(chǎn)的影響
- [雙語翻譯]品牌資產(chǎn)外文翻譯--消費者參與品牌資產(chǎn)創(chuàng)造
- [雙語翻譯]品牌資產(chǎn)外文翻譯--消費者參與品牌資產(chǎn)創(chuàng)造(英文)
- [雙語翻譯]品牌資產(chǎn)外文翻譯--消費者參與品牌資產(chǎn)創(chuàng)造中英全
- 2013年外文翻譯--品牌資產(chǎn)的價值
- [雙語翻譯]品牌外文翻譯--奢侈品服務品牌延伸和品牌資產(chǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移
- [雙語翻譯]品牌資產(chǎn)外文翻譯---口碑傳播對品牌資產(chǎn)的影響接受者視角
- 2013年外文翻譯--品牌資產(chǎn)的價值.DOCX
- [雙語翻譯]品牌資產(chǎn)外文翻譯---口碑傳播對品牌資產(chǎn)的影響接受者視角(英文)
- [雙語翻譯]品牌外文翻譯--奢侈品服務品牌延伸和品牌資產(chǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移(英文)
- [雙語翻譯]品牌資產(chǎn)外文翻譯---口碑傳播對品牌資產(chǎn)的影響接受者視角中英全
- [雙語翻譯]品牌外文翻譯--奢侈品服務品牌延伸和品牌資產(chǎn)轉(zhuǎn)移中英全
- 2013年外文翻譯--品牌資產(chǎn)的價值(英文).PDF
- 管理品牌資產(chǎn)[外文翻譯]
- [雙語翻譯]外文翻譯--酒店品牌策略
- [雙語翻譯]品牌管理外文翻譯-新興市場的品牌危機管理
- [雙語翻譯]外文翻譯--酒店品牌策略(譯文)
- [雙語翻譯]品牌管理外文翻譯-新興市場的品牌危機管理(英文)
評論
0/150
提交評論